User talk:CerealContainer

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Promotion (chess) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Promotion (chess) was changed by TrickshotsBSYT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93742 on 2021-01-07T18:55:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fast forward have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fast forward was changed by TrickshotsBSYT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869829 on 2021-02-24T02:09:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jesse Lee Peterson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate on what you mean by "constructive?" TrickshotsBSYT (talk) 00:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Controversial Reddit communities, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of suicides in Imperial Japan (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Otr500 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The importance of the list could be argued as a navigational aid but as currently presented the notability of the list is questioned by the title of the "one source" which is also problematic. The one source title is "Japanese Mass Suicides", that would include those that did so willingly or by force (ordered). This list is of individuals (and their methods), specifically relating to WWII, as opposed to actual Mass suicides and Banzai charges. The Battle of Saipan included both Banzai charges and mass suicides such as soldiers and civilians jumping off a cliff. See: Suicide Cliff and Banzai Cliff. I am not suggesting that a list could not be important or useful but that the title cannot be so ambiguous as to conflict with the "sourcing" and content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of suicides in Imperial Japan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Otr500 (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The list is supposed to be a mimic of List of suicides in Nazi Germany. It is supposed to list high-ranking individuals from the Empire of Japan who committed suicide during WWII, not about Imperial Japanese suicides in general. CerealContainer (talk) 01:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CerealContainer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Otr500 (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of suicides in Imperial Japan

Hello, CerealContainer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of suicides in Imperial Japan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]