User talk:Trentthetigerman123

December 2020

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Causes of autism. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Causes of autism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Causes of autism was changed by Trentthetigerman123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895642 on 2020-12-22T23:11:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Acroterion (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Re causes of autism

Hi!

It looks like Acroterion has given you some advice on their talk page, which may be of help. Beginning by notifying you of WP:3RR: you may not revert another editor more than 3 times on the same article in any 24 hour period. Looks like you've had a bit of a rough start above, but that's okay!

Regarding your edit itself, you need to be careful to use an encyclopaedic tone. Every assertion you make must be sourced to a reliable source, and written in a neutral manner. If your edits are being disputed, it's often a good idea to go to the talk page and discuss with other editors there and try to compose a version of the text which is acceptable to all parties.

For some more helpful advice, your edit kinda goes and does its own thing. You need to write something which fits into the current context, including the stuff that's already there, if that makes sense? Currently it's restating some stuff already in the section, adding some new stuff, and some of it is possibly too much detail for that article. If you want to try making smaller edits to the article, I think that may be a good idea too. Though, as I say, you will need to be careful not to revert other editors too much.

Let me know if you have any questions, and happy editing! ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)