User talk:Transportfan70

Sandbox

I don't know what you're trying to do in your sandbox. I am trying to help you, but if I knew the purpose things would be easier for me to give you some guidance. Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You contacted me. I didn't know users could access other users sandboxes I'm trying to get the reference links to work. Only the Brampton Transit still won't link. Did you externally modify the links in my sandbox?

First - do not edit another editor's user page. Never! Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

What is the purpose of the links? Where are you going to use them? Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"First - do not edit another editor's user page. Never!"

Sorry. I'm new at this contacting other users stuff. I thought you contacted me with and edited mine so I contacted you by editing yours. It's not supposed to work that way?

This is your "Talk" page and you edited my "User" page. It's easier to conduct a conversation in one place. I can see that you are new, and I was trying to help you with the project in your sandbox. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please sign

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burnhamthorpe Road (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burnhamthorpe Road and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Transportfan70, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 15:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burnhamthorpe Road (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burnhamthorpe Road and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Burnhamthorpe Road has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Burnhamthorpe Road. Thanks! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burnhamthorpe Road has been accepted

Burnhamthorpe Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HurontarioStGoogle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HurontarioStGoogle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Durham Region Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston Road. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution to the DRT page

Have you heard about how we're the first agency to join the Moovit app by crowdsourcing? http://www.cantechletter.com/2016/01/moovit-adds-durham-ontario-region-to-transit-app-through-community-program/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.macuser (talk • contribs) 17:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:HurontarioStGoogle.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HurontarioStGoogle.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Earwig ^talk 23:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Transportfan

I have started the above to discuss your use of multiple accounts, and using an IP to make the same edits. Please review our policies on multiple account use at WP:SOCK. --Rschen7754 06:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Transportfan70, please respond to my request at the SPI. If you don't, you risk being blocked for having multiple accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

What do I have to click on to respond? I really don't know this contact stuff. Transportfan70 (talk) 00:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

It's the link in the section header above. Click on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Transportfan, and then put your comments/response in the section "Comments by other users".--Bbb23 (talk) 01:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

• Transportfan70, per your request, I have indefinitely blocked your older account, Transportfan. This is based on my taking you at your word. If in the future, there is evidence that you have used another account or you have edited without logging in to avoid scrutiny, you risk being blocked indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simcoerd124.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Simcoerd124.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Peel Regional Road 20.png

Thanks for uploading File:Peel Regional Road 20.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...I uploaded a file which was a modified file of an existing already file on Wikimedia Commons, which means it's free to modify. But when I put in what thought was the proper licensing info by crediting the original creator, and uploaded it got a warning the upload was a violation. Here's the link to the file's licensing page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Peel_Regional_Road_20.png

Transportfan70 Transportfan70 (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Where did you find it? Please link to the original so that I can help. You have linked to a user page as the source. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Hi. The issue is the lack of copyright tag. I know you spelled out the license in words, but you'll need the {{cc-by-3.0}} tag on the page. Additionally, under "Permission", you should list the exact file on Commons by EuroCarGT you modified to create your file. For example, if you had based it on File:Peel Regional Road 17.svg, you could say something like "This image is a modified version of File:Peel Regional Road 17.svg, created by EuroCarGT, and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. I license my modifications to the file under the same license." I hope this helps. Cheers, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 21:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Supplemental: and this should be uploaded to Commons with the other similar files, or ask for help from the person who created the ones you want to match. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

I inserted the link to the proper license: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Peel_Regional_Road_20.png#Summary Is it good now? You also mentioned that I should list the exact file I modified. Is the one you posted traced to be the exact one? There are so many I just picked one.

WAKE UP CALL!

@Transportfan70:} Your uploads to commons of File:Hwy400and9construction.png and File:YongeStSimcoeSign.png are at the risk of being deleted, because you have not properly licensed them. Please fix that, or they will be lost. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

What do I have to do? I uploaded them as my own work, which they are. Transportfan70 (talk) 16:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of roads in Mississauga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kennedy Road. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Transportfan70. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airport Road (Ontario) has been accepted

Airport Road (Ontario), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danforth Avenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerrard Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Page won't move from draft to article

This is the page I want to move from Drafts to an article:

Could it not move because Lakeshore Road (no actual article) redirects to Ontario Highway 2 and prevents it from moving?

Transportfan70 (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

I have moved the draft. WP:RM would be a good place to request a move. Huon (talk) 21:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. But my sandbox still has the draft still in it, which was itself a redirect from a page move. How would I restore the sandbox to its default?

Your sandbox was a redirect. Diannaa reset it. On an unrelated note, please sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~). The wiki software will turn those tildes into your username, a link to your talk page (not particularly relevant here but helpful elsewhere) and a timestamp. That makes it easier for others to keep track of who said what. Huon (talk) 10:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yonge Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queens Quay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sixth Line boundary.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sixth Line boundary.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sheppard Avenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheppard West (TTC). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Airport Road

That's not the reason that was given by the person who closed the discussion. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Downsview

Hi there - I note your edit to Downsview today, where you claim that it's popularly thought of as extending up to Steeles, but you've added it as an unreferenced/unsupported statement. It really needs a reference; frankly I don't think Downsview goes above Sheppard or Finch, but I'm just one person. My reflex was to revert your edit, but I thought I would leave you this note instead as a courtesy. PKT(alk) 17:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

The perception that Downsview extends to Steeles is common. I've heard it quite a lot. Lots of businesses in particular do. For example:

http://www.academyoflearning.com/locations_ontario_toronto_downsview.html
http://mail.toronto-restaurants.com/restaurant-applejacksjunior-8376-90%20Signet%20DriveNorth%20York
http://www.werbar.com/properties/855-877-alness-street-downsview-ontario/
http://www.martinrosspianos.ca/location.htm Transportfan70Transportfan70 (talk) 19:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Transportfan70. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

FYI station renaming

As as local editor, you may have an interest in Talk:Toronto Pearson Viscount Station#Requested move 6 February 2018. So far the discussion seems to be by people who do not regularly take an interest in Toronto stations. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Re: Removal of sentence in Tierra del Fuego article

I don't; none of theWikipedia articles about this topic specify boundaries for these sort of things. And it's misleading, too: Punta Arenas is really not that far north of Tierra del Fuego. Graham87 05:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Please take a look at list of Toronto subway stations talk page

Hi there, I see you are making some changes to this page. I brought up a discussion in the talk page about it. It seems like text is preferred over images, especially for computers that have difficulty reading images, and due to the fact that the streetcar and bus icons look almost identical. Also some logos are difficult to match to their respective transit agencies. Please reply in that thread if you have an opinion. Thanks. Mattximus (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario Highway 169, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expressway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Transportfan70. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Brant and Prince Edward

Hi. Pardon the two reverts. Ontario's unconventional approach to municipal statuses has admittedly made things complicated on Wikipedia over the years. Before delving into the pre-tier municipal statuses of the above, see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ontario/Archive 1#City infoboxes: "tier" or "conventional" municipal statuses (or both)?. This is where consensus was achieved on how to present municipal status types in the settlement_type field of infoboxes for Ontario municipalities.

January 1, 2003 was the effective date when the new municipal status regime of upper, lower and single tier municipalities was implemented (see third note here). According to StatCan's Interim List of Changes to Municipal Boundaries, Status and Name From January 2, 1996 to January 1, 2001, the Town of Paris and the townships of Brantford, Burford, Oakland, Onondaga, and South Dumfries amalgamated to create a city named Brant-on-the-Grand effective January 1, 20011999 (page 154 of 419). Concurrently, Brant-on-the-Grand was renamed Brant, with city remaining its status (also page 154). Similarly, the Town of Picton, the villages of Bloomfield and Wellington, and the townships of Ameliasburgh, Athol, Hallowell, Hillier, North Marysburgh, Sophiasburgh, and South Marysburgh amalgamated to create a city named Prince Edward on January 1, 1998 (page 220 of 419). What I understand from this is Brant and Prince Edward, each with city status upon amalgamation, branded themselves as counties in name only by adopting the official legal names of County of Brant and Prince Edward County respectively. Hwy43 (talk) 23:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Why not call it a Municipality then? Nowhere in either article does it refer to them as cities.Transportfan70 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

That would not work though. We have 65-70 municipalities in Ontario with "municipality" as their municipal status sub-type, none of which are the County of Brant and Prince Edward County. A sentence can be added to both articles about their unconventional city status. In the meantime, I will see if I can peruse copies of the Ontario Gazette that include the ministerial orders that set out the amalgamations. Hopefully the ministerial orders confirmed both their post-amalgamation municipal status types and official legal names for the period before January 1, 2003 where the new tiered system of municipal status types came into effect. Hwy43 (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

And it turns out both articles already mention city status. See the last paragraph at County of Brant#History (I have since revised it), and the first sentence at Prince Edward County, Ontario#Government. I've since added this to the end of Prince Edward County, Ontario#History too. Hwy43 (talk) 03:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilson Yard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadheading (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Blankwhite.jpg

The file File:Blankwhite.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

I uploaded it to fill a space to replace an oddly undeletable file in an infobox. A white space remained so I didn't use it. Delete it. Transportfan70 (talk) 02:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mississauga City Centre has been accepted

Mississauga City Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 21:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

TCH

On Ontario Provincial Highway Network, you made some changes, particularly this one, which makes me figure we would be ideal juxtapositions to arrive at ideal wording.

In particular, the removal of this wording has me contemplating:

"a distinctive white maple leaf on a reflective green background used throughout Canada, which is placed below or beside the provincial marker in Ontario." -> "distinctive green markers with a white maple leaf on them throughout Canada."

I'll offer more on this tomorrow, but for now I'll just say that the article should, almost exclusively, pretend as if Ontario is the only place on Earth, unless necessary to expand beyond that. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 03:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

I only modified the text and added some info to make the words flow better due to the overall edit, I didn't actually write it initially. TBH, to describe the oddness of TCH designation in Ontario, you need to compare other provinces. Transportfan70 (talk) 15:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Indeed. I'm hoping for some input since I've generally gone unabated on highway topics. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of roads in Brampton (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dege31 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of roads in Brampton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of roads in Brampton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dege31 (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Information regarding transfers between TTC and other suburban transit agencies, special fare agreements for TTC services outside Toronto and TTC Times Two with Metrolinx.

It is very clear for many years now that the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has no free transfer agreements with any of the suburban or long distance transit service providers - Brampton Transit, MiWay (Mississauga Transit), GO Transit, York Region Transit (YRT), Durham Region Transit (DRT), Via Rail, Amtrak, Greyhound, Megabus, TOK Coachlines and Ontario Northland.

Anytime customers transfer between TTC and other suburban or long-distance transit companies (listed above), they are required to pay an additional fare for the selected transit agency.

Even though Union Pearson Express (UPX), operates from Toronto's Union Station to Pearson Airport only (which is only within the City of Toronto's boundaries), customers transferring between TTC and UPX also have to pay additional fares for this service as well.

Although from January 2018 to March 2020 Metrolinx (which owns Presto, GO and UPX services) used to provide discounted double fares for customers transferring between TTC and GO or UPX services - both of which are fare by distance commuter services - so long as the customer was paying a single fare using a Presto card.

When it comes to several TTC contracted bus routes that operate from Toronto to Mississauga (west of Airport) or Toronto to York Region (north of Steeles) on behalf of those municipalities respectively. Customers have to pay both the TTC and MiWay or YRT jurisdiction fares respectively for these TTC bus services they rely on if they cross the municipal borders. (South of Steeles means TTC fare, north of Steeles means YRT fare) (West of Airport means MiWay fare, East of Airport means TTC fare) The additional fare on these TTC bus services outside of Toronto is the equivalent of the suburban transit agency's YRT or MiWay fare respectively and transfers to those agency's connecting buses - so long as the transfer is valid and fits within these respective transfer rules - are also included. As for the Line 1 Yonge University Spadina subway Even though the two subway stations located in Vaughan (a part of York Region) includes Highway 407 and Vaughan Metropolitan Centre stations. There are no extra fares required for customers to get on or off at these stations as these aforementioned stations are part of the TTC Toronto fare zone due to the impracticality of implementing a pay-on-exit system. This means customers can ride the full length of Line 1 on a single TTC fare. However customers transferring between the TTC subway and other suburban transit agencies - such as GO Transit, Ontario Northland, YRT or Brampton Transit - are required to pay an additional fare at these aforementioned stations, like they do when transferring between TTC and other suburban transit agencies located within or bordering Toronto.

As for the TTC Times Two program. Even though a separate fare is charged when transferring between TTC and Metrolinx-owned GO Transit or Union Pearson Express (UPX) services, however riders who paid the initial TTC fare with cash, tokens or legacy tickets and who obtain a paper transfer from their first TTC ride can use GO or UPX for an intermediate stage of their journey and can change back to the TTC – at designated locations only which can be found here [1] – without having to pay a second TTC fare to complete a trip; this policy is called "TTC Times Two". These restrictions do not apply when using Presto. (For example if a customer swipes a Presto card using the card balance when boarding the first TTC vehicle their TTC fare will be deducted and a two-hour TTC transfer will be applied to the Presto card automatically. Then when you transfer and swipe on and off GO or UPX, their extra GO or UPX fare will also be deducted from the Presto e-purse balance and when you get back on TTC and swipe your Presto card again to complete a trip - regardless of location - so long its within the 2-hour TTC transfer window, your TTC transfer will be validated and no extra TTC fare is charged).

I hope this helps. Alex (Brampton) (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

You're not getting my point: The sections in various articles for fares outside Toronto have to do with FARE ZONES and how they compare with the old (pre-1973) fare zone system for TTC buses crossing zones or connecting to subway stations outside the "former" City of Toronto. TTC buses crossing Steeles into York Region etc. are the equivalents of TTC buses crossing outside the "old" Toronto boundary into the pre-1973 Zone 2, and local suburban agencies (YRT, Miway, etc.) are comparable to the old Zone 2 TTC routes connecting at subway stations (or connecting with inter-zonal routes) in the old Zone 2. As for GO Transit, Ontario Northland, etc., these are a different order of transit altogether and don't have general free transfers with the TTC in Toronto itself either (seriously, does any normal person honestly expect to transfer free to an intercity bus to Thunder Bay on a TTC fare?) and are thus irrelevant to the topic of fare zones.

As for you other (excessively detailed) points, I don't have much dispute with them, other than bad grammar, unnecessary detail, and saying transfers to suburban agency buses are "free" after paying the extra outside-Toronto fare (which IS the suburban fare so they're hardly free) on TTC buses.

And I'm not the only editor that has issues with your editing.

I hope THAT helps you. Cheers. Transportfan70 (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

TTC horns

Can Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Flexity Outlook streetcars honk? Some people say there is/was no such thing as TTC streetcar horns, as they only have ding ding ding, is that right? People say that only TTC buses and subways honk and streetcars have chime only, is that right? If the TTC streetcars had the honk what do they sound like? Alex (Brampton) (talk) 16:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

The new streetcars have both bells and horns. Transportfan70 (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

What does the new TTC streetcar horn sound like? Alex (Brampton) (talk) 18:28, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Hard to describe, but not like car or truck horns. PS: Check your talk page. Transportfan70 (talk) 00:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

TTC Scarborough LRT future plans

Do you think that the Toronto Transit Commission should keep the existing Line 3 Scarborough also known as the Scarborough Rapid Transit line in service until 2026 since the 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to take place in North America that summer including Toronto, Canada when thousands of people around the world are expected to descend into our city? I don't want the TTC to close Line 3 until after the FIFA World Cup is finished that year. TTC should keep Line 3 trains in service until fall 2026 and then close it down and replace it TTC buses until the new underground Line 2 Bloor-Danforth subway extension into Scarborough at Sheppard and McCowan opens. Your thoughts Transportfan70? Alex (Brampton) (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Mississauga Transitway Map.svg

Hey, I noticed a small error in an image you uploaded recently. In File:Mississauga Transitway Map.svg, you have a marker at "Fieldgate" but no station exists there in the actual system. I know at one point, Tahoe was planned to be named Fieldgate but that changed before the station opened. Cheers, BLAIXX 19:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Will correct Transportfan70 (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Done.

While were on the subject, I see that "Future services" in the Port Credit GO station infobox for the Hurontario LRT uses green for the line color. Is that official? I used black for my map to be generic Transportfan70 (talk) 02:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! No, that colour is not official. The green shade was used by Metrolinx in some promotional material but I expect it to change. BLAIXX 03:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Züm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Busway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heartland Town Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oakville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Dixie Road (Peel Region)

Hi @Transportfan70: How goes it. I reverted that back. I reviewed the article as part of the WP:NPP process. Unsourced content cannot remain in a mainspace article. That has been the standard for a long while now. Its not a case of flagging it up with some tags and leaving it. The stuff has already been flagged and has never been referenced since it was created, which is unacceptable. You cannot a block of text without references. If you revert it, then eventually will be at the edit warring noticeboard either today or tommorrow. If you have references, then plase add them in, which would be the best way of following the standard. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 06:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Are you new to this? I've never heard of you before. I'll look for references. Transportfan70 (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)