User talk:Transfromers2

Speedy deletion nomination of of Matt Prokop

A tag has been placed on Matt Prokop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it does not provide any sources to ensure his notability, the stub has this person starred in a film that hasn't announced its cast list yet (HSM4), and is no more than a copy of its IMDB entry

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cactusjump (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Transfromers2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. kollision (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Miller Smith

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jake Miller Smith, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 19:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Olsen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alan Olsen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Hoax article. No sources offered or found for any assertions in the article. External link given was to an entry on IMDb for someone other than the subject of the article. The other link doesn't work. No IMDB entry for the subject nor is there a mention on the IMDb entries for the films mentioned. No ghits looking for a combination of anything that would even remotely connect the subject to any of the works mentioned.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 21:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Thomas Hoffman

I have nominated Thomas Hoffman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Hoffman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wperdue (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matt Prokop

The article Matt Prokop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP; not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Transfromers2! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 49 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Matt Prokop - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kasey Russell

The article Kasey Russell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actress who has only had 2 roles to date and that's it as well as been tagged for notability for years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]