User talk:Trandodit
Welcome
[edit]
|
July 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. An edit that you recently made to Robert Icke seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Please...
[edit]...stop removing the changes to the Duncan Macmillan (playwright) page. You are adding information that he doesn't wish to have in the public domain. He'd rather not be on Wikipedia at all, frankly, and doesn't want personal information or out-of-date interviews here. He's asked me to remove the information, which I've done only to see that you've reinstated it. I'd really appreciate it if you stopped undoing my edits. Thank you. Bookish1989 (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bookish1989, please be aware that the subject of a Wikipedia biography has no right whatsoever to remove any content which is properly referenced, neutrally written and complies with our policy on biographies of living people. You will have to make the case that this content does not comply with our policies and guidelines. The subject's wishes are not relevant, unless the subject identifies problems with adherence with our policies and guidelines. All involved editors must avoid edit warring and discuss the matter at Talk: Duncan Macmillan (playwright). Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Duncan Macmillan (playwright). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)