User talk:TrainEnthusiast

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Geneseo, New York has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Geneseo, New York was changed by TrainEnthusiast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915066 on 2017-12-29T02:11:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bar Harbor, Maine. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bar Harbor, Maine was changed by TrainEnthusiast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872107 on 2017-12-29T02:19:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make edits like these to Wikipedia without any explanation. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Geneseo, New York has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Geneseo, New York was changed by TrainEnthusiast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933016 on 2018-01-16T22:49:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Morris, New York. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mount Morris, New York was changed by TrainEnthusiast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905489 on 2018-01-16T22:53:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Town vs borough

As I understand it, the term "borough" has a very specific use in the state of New York, so it's inappropriate to change the terminology in articles from "town" to "borough" without having a very good justification for it. Further unexplained edits like this will be taken as vandalism and result in your account being blocked. clpo13_(talk) 23:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Christiana Town Center"

Christiana Town Center, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Boscov's Downtown Binghamton"

Boscov's Downtown Binghamton, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boscov's Downtown Binghamton

A tag has been placed on Boscov's Downtown Binghamton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 00:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boscov's Downtown Wilkes-Barre

A tag has been placed on Boscov's Downtown Wilkes-Barre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Great Northeast Plaza

The article Great Northeast Plaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. O1lI0 (talk) 08:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willow Grove Shopping Plaza

The article Willow Grove Shopping Plaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. O1lI0 (talk) 08:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Northeast Plaza

A tag has been placed on Great Northeast Plaza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Great Northeast Plaza, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Septrillion (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Willow Grove Shopping Plaza

A tag has been placed on Willow Grove Shopping Plaza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Septrillion (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Great Northeast Plaza. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. O1lI0 (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop mass creating articles that are utterly unsourced. I would also strongly advise you respond to other editors concerns as this is a collaborative environment and you're creating a LOT of cleanup for other volunteers. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willow Grove Shopping Plaza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willow Grove Shopping Plaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willow Grove Shopping Plaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm Septrillion. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Glenside station have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Septrillion (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boscov's Downtown Wilkes-Barre

A tag has been placed on Boscov's Downtown Wilkes-Barre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Scr★pIron^IV 13:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boscov's Downtown Binghamton

A tag has been placed on Boscov's Downtown Binghamton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Scr★pIron^IV 13:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Roosevelt Mall. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm Hiàn. I noticed that you recently removed content from Great Northeast Plaza without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove PROD requests without contesting deletion. hiàn 22:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Willow Grove Shopping Plaza, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. O1lI0 (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Great Northeast Plaza. Septrillion (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Great Northeast Plaza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Great Northeast Plaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Northeast Plaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Septrillion (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boscov's Downtown Binghamton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boscov's Downtown Binghamton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boscov's Downtown Binghamton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently removing maintenance templates, including deletion templates, inappropriately and/or without providing justification. If an article you created is nominated for deletion, you may comment at its respective deletion discussion, but you may not remove the "this article has been nominated for deletion" notice at the top. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Given this SPI the block history of The Train Master (talk · contribs), I think a lengthier block on this account may be warranted. Septrillion (talk) 00:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They also appear to be evading an active block here Septrillion (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the SPI. I wasn't aware of the former account. I'm going to leave the block as it is, with a warning to TrainEnthusiast that if the same behavior continues after the block expires, you may be blocked again. If you have any questions whatsoever about this block, e.g. if you don't understand why you have been blocked, please let us know here so that we can clarify. Mz7 (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philadelphia Mills. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 19:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Walt Whitman Shops, you may be blocked from editing. Septrillion (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to start conversing on talk pages, and try to understand why you keep being reverted. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and that means you discuss edits, especially if you find yourself being reverted repeatedly. I'm open to lifting the block earlier if you can explain your understanding of why your edits were disruptive, and what you will do once you are unblocked. I also must ask you to list all other accounts you have used. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: This user is still removing AFD notices for articles they created, and removing maintenance tags without fixing them. Scr★pIron^IV 20:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

South Nyack Station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, South Nyack Station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nyack Station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nyack Station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

South Nyack Station and Nyack Station

Hi TrainEnthusiast, Greetings to you. Please note that content added/edited in Wikipedia needs needs "inline citation" from independent "third party" reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR).

citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Instructions: Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the fields as per the Template: cite web and save when it is done). Examples below:

To add an in-line text citation for an internet reference: <ref>{{cite web|url =https://www.mmafighting.com/2018/4/5/17203890/watch-conor-mcgregor-throw-a-dolly-through-ufc-223-fighter-bus-window |title = Watch Conor McGregor throw a dolly through UFC 223 fighter bus window|accessdate = 15 April 2018|author=|last =Al-Shatti |first = Shaun |publication = mmafighting|date = 15 April 2018|archivedate =15 April 2018 }}</ref>
To add an in-line text citation for a paper reference: <ref name="Green">Green, William: ''Observers Aircraft'', page 228. Frederick Warne Publishing, 1991. ISBN 0 7232 3697 6</ref>

(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation. Fill the info and change the date as needed. See on source edit view mode.)

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page to get it publish. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit [[Page semi-protected Wikipedia:Tutorial]] and WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you and let me know if you need further assistance. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nyack station

The article Nyack station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Nyack station

The article South Nyack station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nyack, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memorial Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Boscov's Downtown Wilkes-Barre. Scr★pIron^IV 20:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: this is a sockpuppet of The Train Master (talk · contribs) per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Train Master. It was assumed that the master had lost the password to the original account and had abandoned it as a result, but we now know this not to be the case. This account may need to be indeffed. Septrillion (talk) 02:11, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate and Sro23: Thoughts? -- ferret (talk) 02:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The SPI doesn't look conclusive (no checkuser involvement) but still looks WP:DUCKy. However, due to the obvious similarity in contributions and behavior, I am indef-blocking this account. The user will have to get the original "The Train Master" account unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good block, but the user is not a sockpuppet. The reason The Train Master was blocked was simply so that the person operating these accounts would be restricted to only one (TrainEnthusiast). There wasn't actually any abuse of multiple accounts, more like account jumping. Sro23 (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this account was an attempt at an informal clean start? If so, I don't think it worked out very well. TrainEnthusiast, just follow the advice given on both your talk pages (here and the previous account), and you may be unblocked. Please don't create any more accounts; this would be sock puppetry. Instead, make an unblock request. This should ideally be done from the oldest account, which seems to be The Train Master. If you don't understand why you were blocked, please ask us, and we'll try to explain. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Nyack station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Nyack station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Nyack station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Septrillion (talk) 01:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Warning: while you are blocked, you may use your talk page only to discuss your block. You may not use it for any other purpose. If you continue to do so, you will lose access to this talk page also. The only reason this talk page is still available for you to edit is for you to appeal your block and engage in discussion about your block. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:TrainEnthusiast, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. @Anachronist: this user has misused this page again. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 21:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right, using your talk page for any other purpose than dealing with your block will result in your talk page access being revoked. Please, if you want to be unblocked, formulate a good appeal and post it. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]