User talk:Tracykey91
What I Will Create or Change
[edit]I published my article on Functionalism in After School Programs, I went over the basis, of its concept in functionalism, the statistics of improvement, and the funding that goes along with it.
Tracykey91 (talk) 02:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Functionalism In After School Programs
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Functionalism In After School Programs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. KJ «Click Here» 23:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Status and Advice
[edit]As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article. Not because it is promotional in the usual sense, but because it shows internal signs of being copied directly from one or more sources, using phrases like "in our study we showed...".
Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously; and does not accept material copied from other sources unless it is in the public domain, or released to us under a free license (It is, by the way, not necessary for pages to have a notice to be copyright: everything published on the internet or elsewhere is copyright to the owner of that content unless specified otherwise.)
It might be possible to get permission, but there is no point in doing so--a formal publication of this sort almost always is unsuitable for WP, because it is usually written either as a press release, or in excessive detail, often using special terminology without explanation.
Please never copy this way from an outside source again, and be absolutely certain to avoid Close paraphrase.Rewrite everuything from scratch, changing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas.
It is also not clear to me what the article is about., and the meaning of "functionalism" as you use it--I'm not a specialist in education policy. , but it seems to fit none of the meanings used in any of the WP articles listed under functionalism. In ordinary language, I would say that your topic is effectives of after-school programs. Please try to explain when you rewrite, in order to make your meaning more evident to the general reader.
The article seems to be based entirely on a single study at "University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children, 2007. " We usually do not do that, but write our articles in a broader way, to deal with a subject, including all perspectives. The article should present the information,and report the conclusions and the criticism. It should not itself be written to draw conclusions. See as guides for this WP:NPOV , WP:Original research and WP:SYNTHESIS. I look forward to your contributions. DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)