User talk:Totosy

Comparative cultural studies is field of study where selected tenets of the discipline of comparative literature are merged with selected tenets of the field of cultural studies meaning that the study of culture and culture products -- including but not restricted to literature, communication, media, art, etc. -- is performed in a contextual and relational construction and with a plurality of methods and approaches, inter-disciplinarity, and, if and when required, including team work. In comparative cultural studies it is the processes of communicative action(s) in culture and the how of these processes that constitute the main objectives of research and study. However, comparative cultural studies does not exclude textual analysis proper or other established fields of study. In comparative cultural studies, ideally, the framework of and methodologies available in the systemic and empirical study of culture are favoured. (see Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven. "From Comparative Literature Today toward Comparative Cultural Studies." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 1.3 (1999): http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1041 & Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India, 2013. & Purdue University print monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/comparative-cultural-studies ).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Totosy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i did NOT write the article about myself: only expanded it somewhat with a few of my publications and this should be allowed thanks and best, steven totosy

December 2014

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ryemaybee#Sock

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Ryemaybee#Sock. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i am not sure whether a reply with regard to two items which were deleted from wikipedia is to be done here or not...: in any case, here are my replies re the two deletions:

1) Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek = i did not write the entry about myself and have no idea who wrote it; however, when it appeared on wikipedia i corrected it as i thought this would be allowed, but apprently it is not and so it goes; further, one of the wikipedia editors wrote that he/she cannot find any sources about my work in order to make certain that my work would indeed be significant: my response is that he/she did not look for long and if he/she consulted sources which are available online only even then there are a number of sources...: here is a recent example of a printed source where my contribution to scholarship is highlighted: Domínguez, César (U of Santiago de Compostela), Haun Saussy (U of Chicago), and Darío Villanueva (U of Santiago de Compostela), eds. Introducing Comparative Literature: New Trends and Applications. London: Routledge, 2015. 14-15, 103.; another example is that since one of my books was released re copyright and published online in 2011 <http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweblibrary/totosycomparativeliterature1998> it has been downloaded 20674 times and this suggests that book attracts interest

2) comparative cultural studies: while there is wikipedia correspondence that this entry has been deleted, it does appear so i am not sure: this entry i input on wkipedia in 2009, but am not sure what i did wrong and the case remains that this field of the humanities is something i myself developed since the late 1990s incl. a large number of articles and the publication of a Purdue University Press journal and print monograph series; if this is not enough or appropriate to list the field on wikipedia, so it goes

with many thanks, steven totosy

Draft:Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek

Hello, Totosy. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

reply by totosy de zepetnek on 3 october 2015: i already replied that i DID NOT WRITE or upload the entry on myself entitled "Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek|Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek" = what did is that i edited what was posted; at one point i received statements by wikipedia editors re the reasons stated why my work is not well know enough and what i remember is that part of the statements included something like "could not verify publications" because they are "not available inline": this alone is an inane suggestion for obvious reasons... in any case, if wikipedia and its editors decide that my work does not merit an entry, so be it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.202.200 (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Totosy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]