User talk:Torontojeff
The Brady Bunch, and the term "jumped the shark"
[edit]Your edits here and your reinsertion after I had reverted them are appreciated. But note what I said in the edit summary when I reverted after the first time you made the change. I am under the impression you do not completely understand what jumped the shark is - it is a broad-based concept, broader than simple insertion of characters into a show that's slumping in the ratings. And if you had read the entire paragraph you were editing, I wonder if you saw the term in the preceding sentence; you are essentially making a redundant claim by putting the term in a second time. The original text, and term, "Cousin Oliver" is also mentioned under List of The Brady Bunch characters#Cousin Oliver as "Cousin Oliver syndrome", which is a specific case of "jumped the shark" where they add younger characters to a show due to an aging original cast in order to regain appeal of their audience. There was nothing wrong with that original text, and it states the claim more clearly then two mentions of "jumped the shark" in consecutive sentences. If you disagree with how I see things here, please reply to this or on my talk page; unless you explain your rationale behind the edit, I have to deem it unconstructive/disruptive, and you may receive warnings next time. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure how you missed it, considering you edited around it twice [1][2], but there was a very obvious embedded note in the |birth_date= parameter of the Infobox at Mary Jo Catlett instructing users that per WP:BLPPRIVACY, birthdates must be sourced and widely published. With identity theft a serious ongoing concern, people increasingly regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object.
Please be sure to provide references from reliable sources when you add birthdates for living persons. Much obliged. Note that IMDb is not considered a reliable source. (WP:RS/IMDB, WP:RS, WP:TVFAQ)
Also, since I'm noticing a pattern in your edit history of multiple attempts to make what are generally not complicated edits, I need to encourage you to please use the Show Preview button (located right next to Save Page) so you can work out the bugs in your contributions before saving them to an article. In these edits [3][4][5][6], Show Preview would have helped you spot mistakes like the unresolved wikilinks in the first three edits.
- The series aired in Canada by [[Dejaview] channel 636
- The series aired in Canada by Dejaview channel 636
- The series aired in Canada on Dejaview channel 636
- The series aired in Canada on DejaView channel 636
Thanks, and I hope this helps. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Mary Jo. Catlett
[edit]I got the birth info for Mary Jo Catlett from Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torontojeff (talk • contribs)
- That would not be sufficient. All content at Wikipedia needs to come from reliable sources that have a reputation for fact-checking, like magazines, newspapers, books, television news shows, medical journals, etc. Google is a search engine. There is no presumption of fact-checking, let alone a reputation for fact-checking. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- So, the information I got from Google can be right or wrong correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torontojeff (talk • contribs)
- You cannot use Google search results as a reference because as I said above, we need information to come from publications like the ones in my list—publications with reputations for fact-checking. Unrelated to that, let's please keep this discussion here at your talk page. We don't need to duplicate the discussion on mine. Also, please be sure to sign your talk page comments by typing four tildes like this: ~~~~ Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- So, the information I got from Google can be right or wrong correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torontojeff (talk • contribs)
Billie Bird
[edit]Hi Torontojeff, with regard to your query at my talk page, I think it's better if I show you how to do it yourself. "Teach a man to fish" and all.
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Note the example below:
The top and bottom |- (pipe + dash) characters are dividers that tell the table where the next batch of information goes. There are four field parameters, Year, Title, Role, and Notes. In the above example, the Notes field exists, but is blank. In this edit of yours you added the following content:
Now this did not resolve successfully. Let's figure out why. There is a divider at the top, then there are four parameters. Year, Title, Role and Notes. We first need to put a divider at the end of the Happy Days stuff. So that becomes:
The Happy Days row is now fixed. Now we can see that there's a divider after the content you added, so we're in good shape there. But what are we missing? Well, first of all it's easy to notice that the pipes (the vertical lines | ) are missing. We have to add them.
And it also looks like we're missing a parameter. We have Year, Title, and Role, but no notes. Ah, "1 Episode" should be in our notes field. The fix is to add another pipe and to move the content down.
Then we tidy up by removing extra spaces, fixing our formatting (fixing italics for Three's a Crowd) etc.
|
Now you have the tools to do it yourself. Hope this helps and good luck. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Oscar Mayer— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 19:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Johnny Au. Your recent edit to the page Flexity Outlook (Toronto streetcar) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to Whoopi Goldberg
[edit] Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lullaby of Broadway (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 31, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Torontojeff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Torontojeff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Torontojeff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Brady Bunch, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)