User talk:Torlokken

Welcome!

Hello, Torlokken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Enonic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 11:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Enonic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Enonic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Mr X 11:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied talk page

Hi! You added content to the talk page of Enonic to contest its deletion via AfD, however the proper way to do this is to approach Dennis Brown and share your viewpoints. Since I've tagged him in this post, I'm cut/pasting your comments so he can read them.

I am reading the logs that this page was deleted, but don't understand why. The page covers the largest / most important CMS produced in Norway, which is free and open source, and which is now starting to gain international users. The page contained references to both Norwegian newspapers covering the topic, as well as a recent review by one of the most respected CMS editorial sites on the web.

It is mentioned that this is a "typical advertorial on an unremarkable products". What makes it unremarkable? Do you need 5, 10, 100 news articles to make it remarkable? Cite: "Coverage does seem slim for a company that's been around for so long and with offices in USA & UK". When it comes to national coverage in Norway, typical online newspapers sadly normally don't cover this kind of technology. The international offices in London and SF are in the startup phase and, thus, substantial international coverage is yet to come. Note that 4 references are from digi.no, which is one of the largest (or maybe the largest/most important, I don't know) tech websites in Norway.

The log mentions "the NorwegianWiki offers nothing better". Is that a reason for deleting content from the English wikipedia? If a Norwegian version is a requirement, I can create that as well.

One of the best ways to overturn the deletion would be to show coverage for the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that my deletion wasn't a personal one, it was due to the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enonic (2nd nomination). This was the second deletion of the article, and at both AFDs no one voted to keep the article. It was all but unopposed in deletion.

What you have to keep in mind is that Wikipedia has a specific criteria for including a company, found at WP:CORP. Here are examples of things that DON'T matter: How big they are, how important they are, how old they are, how influential they are, how many employees they have. These aren't important and we can't make judgements on those things. What we do is follow the sources, which should be more than just local, should be from reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia, and there should be more than a couple. Many editors were claiming the sources were too weak, failing to meet our standards. It's fine to have some of these lesser quality sources to prove facts, but they don't establish WP:Notability.

I went and looked at the deleted article (admin can see anything deleted) and found the sources to be lacking: PR wire, blogs, that kind of thing, so I can see why the editors voted to delete.

If you want to continue working on the article, Tokyogirl or myself can undelete the article and put it into userspace for you. It wouldn't be "live" on Wikipedia, but you could take a couple of months and dig up sources and improve it. If you were unable to, it would then be deleted again. If it did pass our criteria, then you could ask to get it put back into mainspace. For the record, I trust Tokyogirl79's judgement to take any action she sees fit in this case, no prior permission required from me. Just ping me if I'm needed further. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Ok, please undelete the article and put it into my userspace, I will try to dig up some more reliable sources and make the necessary adjustments to improve it.

It is now at User:Torlokken/Enonic. I reiterate that it can NOT just be moved into main space even after being improved without going to WP:DRV, to myself, or to Tokyogirl79 first. We need to be sure it won't end up back at AFD again in order to restore. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

cmswire.com

Just so you know, the website cmswire.com is not considered a reliable source here [1]. They are a press release blog more than anything, so using a link from them can't be used to demonstrate notability if that article went to AFD. Doesn't mean the link can't be used, but it won't help the article pass WP:GNG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content for review

Hi again Tokyogirl79 and Dennis Brown, I've improved the article and added a lot of references now, I would like you to review this again. @Tokyogirl79: Hi again, I've improved the article and added a lot of references now, I would like you to review this again. Torlokken (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) @Dennis Brown: Hi again, I've improved the article and added a lot of references now, I would like you to review this again. Torlokken (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Enonic eXperience Platform screenshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]