User talk:Topbanana/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

User:Topbanana/Eclipsed Files

Greetings, probably should have asked earlier but is it OK to remove files that are no longer shadowing/shadowed from that page?Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Goodness yes - do whatever you want with the report. From memory there was a plan to add a more complete and regularly generated equivalent of it being discussed at Wikipedia_talk:Database_reports#Request for a New report. If nothing came of this, I can bring User:Topbanana/Eclipsed Files up to date. Good job tackling the issue, keep it up. - TB (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

OK; I'll do so. Having a bot or something to tag thes shadowed files as {{ShadowsCommons}} may be worth discussing, but probably not for here.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Jo-Jo Eumerus: I already have a database report of these files and am planning to go through the whole set. Many of the files have been moved to Commons but in thumbnail forms, and I'm afraid that some people might start moving around those files instead of overwriting and cleaning up the Commons data if the files become too visible. Can't you help resolving the already tagged files first? There are currently about 1200 untagged files which shadow Commons and which are neither up for deletion here nor on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I am working on the other shadowings, but I don't think that adding a few more things to the queue now is necessarily a bad thing.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Tan Sri Halim Saad listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tan Sri Halim Saad. Since you had some involvement with the Tan Sri Halim Saad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dhiyab bin Isa Al Nahyan

The article Dhiyab bin Isa Al Nahyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

АА listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect АА. Since you had some involvement with the АА redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Uncatted stubs

Could you please update Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Uncatted stubs? I see it hasn't been updated since March 2015. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Potato Range

An article that you have been involved in editing—Potato Range —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikimedia tool

Hi, The tool located at http://tools.wmflabs.org/tb-dev/MEA/ is one of the tools which I was searching for since long back. It would be very useful for me. I find multiple Indian languages like Tamil, Telugu, etc, missing in the list. Kindly update the list with more languages. This will enable me to search missing articles and write. Thanks -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

I have added all Wikipediae with more than 10000 articles to the MEA tool. Let me know if you see any problems. - TB (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Topbanana. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

hawkeyebasil (talk · contribs)

Royal Marines Badge SVG issue - Gday MAte the SVG on the Royal Marines Page for the badge no longer works correctly, will display but when click on to view the SVG it goes to a text documentHawkeyebasil (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:R Alternate search method listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:R Alternate search method. Since you had some involvement with the Template:R Alternate search method redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Topbanana.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Topbanana. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Topbanana. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Query request

This page has two query's you wrote & ran over a year ago. I'd like to ask you if you could rerun them. The page can be overwritten. Thanks, -DePiep (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. - TB (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. -DePiep (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

RLRL

Hi! When doing queries @quarry.wmflabs, I can't access lvwiki tables. I can access ptwiki and enwiki. And can you do a rescan for lvwiki? --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

p50380g50491's public databases are in the process of being moved to the s51111 user - so p50380g50491__unlikely_ptwiki_p will become s51111__unlikely_ptwiki_p. The mvoe should be completed in the next day or two. - TB (talk) 15:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

RLRL not working

Hi, since the new year RLRL hasn't been displaying correctly. Is this my setup or a problem with the database? Cheers. welsh (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

I get the headers but no suggestions, on two differently configured machines, so it's not your setup. Topbanana hasn't edited for several weeks - I do hope all is well. I'll try e-mailing the Labs. Certes (talk) 16:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

All fixed now - you caught me on a hemi-demi-semi wikibreak, apologies. The underlying problem was some boneheaded code implemented by me many years ago that has been working all this time only because the nice folks at tool labs have set up such up their environment in a very accomodating and fault-tolerant manner. RLRL (along with all the other tools sharing the same code-base) should be tickety-boo now. Cheers. Things are mostly working, but now that I've checked things out an unrelated error is causing problems (database permission errors) in some tools. Fix pending - TB (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Good to see you back! Certes (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Now generally working but a small bug report in case it helps: Multifix [1] gives SELECT command denied to user 's51111'@'10.68.16.239' for table 'namespace'. Certes (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Ta. I await DBA assistance to fix this (T155902). - TB (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

"Search suggestions" is now working, including Multifix. Thanks to Topbanana, and to the DBA if they're watching!

I've looked at the first page of each list and fixed the links where I agree with the suggestion. Is there any way to get past the first 50 cases I've rejected and see a second page, or do I just need to be patient until they've been viewed enough times to lower their score?

On a slightly different topic, all the Unlikely Links lists are empty, even including whitelisted entries. Have we fixed them all? Certes (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Other than the controls you see at the top of the screen, you can't adjust the suggestions the tool gives you, no. It picks out a selection of those meeting your criteria that it has the highest confidence about; suggestions that have been shown to someone but not fixed have their scores lowered and are less likely to be seen again - unless of course the pool of suggestions being worked through grows too small in which case let me know and I'll 'restock' the tool.

I'll have a look at the Unlikely Links tool this evening for you. - TB (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

That's unlikely links (English-language) fixed - other languages to follow. - TB (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed working for me too. I'm also getting new suggestions - either something mended itself or the false positives have now been viewed enough times. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 01:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

A request

Hello, would you mind running an SQL query for me, to find the number of New Page Patrols by month in the last couple of years or so? I would do it myself, but I have no idea how. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

SELECT SUBSTRING(log_timestamp, 1, 6) AS YYYYMM, COUNT(*), log_action
FROM logging
WHERE log_type="patrol"
GROUP BY YYYYMM;

That should get you started in Quarry, I see about 180,000/month. I'm not familiar with Patrolling (different types?, autopatrol vs ?) — Dispenser 22:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata item for red links

SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT CONCAT("Q", ips_item_id)), lang
FROM wikidatawiki_p.wb_items_per_site
LEFT JOIN meta_p.wiki ON dbname = ips_site_id AND dbname != TRIM("_p" FROM DATABASE()) AND family = "wikipedia"
WHERE ips_site_page = REPLACE("Hollywood_Monsters_2", "_", " ")
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT ips_item_id) = 1;

Improving the red link suggestions in Dab solver, thought I'd share it. — Dispenser 22:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Added JOIN to meta_p.wiki to exclude specieswiki as a language (e.g. Michel Robert Roberge). — Dispenser 13:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

RLRL not working

It seems RLRL is not working with the following error message. It's been like this for some time - I was waiting to see if it healed itself.

No webservice. The URI you have requested, /tb-dev/RLRL/stats.php, is not currently serviced.

welsh (talk) 07:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Still not serviced, along with the whole of /tb-dev. Can we ask someone on Tool Labs to press the start button, or does that task require Banana-shaped intervention? Certes (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Fixed. Apologies for the extended absence - pesky RL commitments. - TB (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

That's working again for me. Thank you! Real life always comes first but it's good to have you back. Certes (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! welsh (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

One curiosity: AUTOFIX is opening the page but no longer shows the find/replace fields to do the fix for me. I've followed the instructions again (although it was working a few months ago anyway). Does AUTOFIX work for other users now, in which case it's my configuration problem, or has it broken? Certes (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Similar for me. It seemed to be working in some circumstances, but largely not. welsh (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marion Marshall (author)

The article Marion Marshall (author) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Tools are 502ing

So your tools have been down for a few weeks apparently, likely due to your IRL commitments. What do you think about adding another maintainer? While I'm over-committed myself, I would be able to address small issues such as this and already have a bit of knowledge on your code. — Dispenser 17:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm going ahead on adoption (while the whole server burnt down with yesterday's HDD failure). If you'd like to expedite it, add me in the management interface. — Dispenser 16:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saulteau First Nations

Hello Topbanana,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saulteau First Nations for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Owlsmcgee (talk) 05:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Topbanana. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment

Please could you comment at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#SVG file question because it involves an image thst you uploaded? Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marion Marshall (author)

The article Marion Marshall (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Writer of a handful of romance novels, some self-published, no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 09:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Аrtur Petrosyan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Аrtur Petrosyan. Since you had some involvement with the Аrtur Petrosyan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 17:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

As pointed at a WP:BN you had a deleted edit from 20170808, so this action has been reversed and postponed until at least 20180808. You can stop the process by making any edit still. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 12:52, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm barely active at all - if it's more convenient to de-sysop me and reapply if and when I become active, that's absolutely fine by me. - TB (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi TB, if you would like your flag removed please post at least a very short section at WP:BN for our records. If you ask for removal at BN you can resume access by asking at BN so long as you meet the time requirements in Wikipedia:Administrators#Restoration_of_adminship; or at any time via the WP:RFA process. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 15:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Nationalist Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Nationalist Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Nationalist Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 05:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Topbanana. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

List (abstract data type listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List (abstract data type. Since you had some involvement with the List (abstract data type redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your Toolforge tool 'tb-dev' needs attention

https://tools.wmflabs.org/trusty-tools/u/tb lists tools you maintain which need to be manually migrated from the legacy Ubuntu Trusty job grid to the new Debian Stretch job grid. Emails notifying you of this have been bouncing, so updating the email address associated with your Developer account would also be appreciated. --BDavis (WMF) (talk) 21:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns redirect

I believe this redirect Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns (SAAWK) is incorrect. The page it points to, Academy of Science of South Africa (ASAf) is a new organisation started in 1996, while SAAWK started in about 1906 and has not been replaced by ASAf. There just isn't an English version of the page that exists on Afrikaans Wikipedia Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns. Please could you undo this redirect, thanks. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Control Commission for Germany - British Element listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Control Commission for Germany - British Element. Since you had some involvement with the Control Commission for Germany - British Element redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Еvgeny Lebedev listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Еvgeny Lebedev. Since you had some involvement with the Еvgeny Lebedev redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 08:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

СGA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect СGA. Since you had some involvement with the СGA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

enfield paul (talk · contribs)

please can you return the article kingston hospital radio to my sandbox. i do not understand what you mean by redirects etc, and I find the wikipedia guidelines confusing and complicated. i work for the charity involved so am not sure how why i don't seem to be able to use our content. all i need is for someone to say do this, don't do this in relation to my article. if necessary i will move it to a special page. thanks.

Thanks so much for your time and consideration to help. Being not nice (talk) 08:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of John Douglas Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Douglas Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Douglas Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 22:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

"АUF" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect АUF. Since you had some involvement with the АUF redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

"СGA" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect СGA. Since you had some involvement with the СGA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

"Yasu'" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yasu'. Since you had some involvement with the Yasu' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

"Yasu'a" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yasu'a. Since you had some involvement with the Yasu'a redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)