User talk:TootyBoy

June 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Asian Boyz, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amccann421 (talk) 18:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC) HI I HAVE LEFT YOU A MESSAGE ON YOUR TALK PAGE. IF WE COULD TALK IN PRIVATE RIGHT HERE IT WOULD BE COOL THANKS.

TootyBoy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TootyBoy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the invitation. Have a good day. Peace. Many Blessings.TootyBoy (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Westbury Road Entertainment, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC) I did give a valid reason you are making issues that are not a issue or have been corrected TootyBoy (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 06:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC) To [[User:Acroterion| Yes thank you for your time and advice the User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JJMC89 is commiting vandalism on the Westbury Road Entertainment article right here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westbury_Road_Entertainment&redirect=no he or she has been erasing the referesnces, sources, info, and then putting templates on the article that are libel and the User JJMC89 also tried to delete the article when many Wikipedia Adminstrator'sTootyBoy (talk) 06:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC) and Staff have deemed it notable as you can see for yourself in the article creation log. Can you please help me get page protection for this article, and have User JJMC89 blocked as well as he or she's IP Address?

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 06:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

If I see another edit summary like this one [1] you will be blocked. This edit summary [2] is patently false. Acroterion (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 06:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Since you repeated your personal attacks after my warning, I have blocked you. Acroterion (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)