User talk:Tools4$ale

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Redwood Falls, Minnesota, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to The Mess of the Senses, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carson Paskewitz (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carson Paskewitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carson Paskewitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tools4$ale! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Carson Paskewitz

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Carson Paskewitz, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:LaundryPizza03 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Parsley (name), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spud (nickname), you may be blocked from editing. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Song. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Adding crap you made up is vandalism and will not be tolerated. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, attempting to blame it on your brother won't help you per what is said in WP:BROTHER. You are responsible for actions made on your account. Even if it actually was your brother you would still remain blocked because that means your account has become compromised. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]