User talk:TonyStank123456789

This is TonyStank123456789's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (December 15)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:New Rockstars|cv=no|reason=v|details=|reason2=npov|details2=|comment=See [[WP:CITEOVERKILL] and WP:RS.|sig=yes}}

Hello, TonyStank123456789! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There have been changes to address the comment left by the reviewer or the previous decline reasons, besides switching some first names to last names and some removal of unreliable sources. Please try to fully address them before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Rockstars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Rockstars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Perryprog (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TonyStank123456789! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I need help with my article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:New Rockstars, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hellknowz were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much content heavily relies on primary and unreliable sources. This leads to content that unencyclopedic and puffery. We are interested what reliable secondary sources say about the channel, not all the trivial things that the channel is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Rockstars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:New Rockstars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SuperCarlinBrothers (July 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Doric Loon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: After being declined, reworked and resubmitted twice, this draft still contains nothing to demonstrate any real importance for an encyclopedia. The citations are trivial. The claims made about the subjects' achievements really are not more than those of many bloggers. I don't think number of views in itself gives notability. I suggest waiting five years and then considering if by then these vloggers have made waves.

Doric Loon (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]