Jump to content

User talk:Tonkarooson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page👋. For the rules, please be nice and expect me to be not very experienced editing on Wikipedia.

Also, my phrases when communicating with fellow editors could not be described good for some of you guys.

Archives: Useless.

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Tonkarooson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 04:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Btspurplegalaxy again. Sorry to bother you again but I have a question that I'm both curious and confused about. On the article All Eyes on Me (Jisoo song), I had added "K-pop" to the genres under the Quick Facts box, but it got removed 2 times by two different people; you can find these edits at the top of the revision history, as it's still new changes as if typing this. Is there a more specific response for this? Tonkarooson (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason why it was removed was because K-Pop isn't a music genre. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 13:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think K-Pop is a genre; there are other things that make sense that say it isn't a genre. What makes it not a music genre to Wikipedia? Tonkarooson (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Tonkarooson, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special interest (Autism) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Special interest (autism). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It needs to be written in encyclopedic language (see WP:EPSTYLE) and the claims made should be sourced to reliable sources (see WP:RS, WP:REFB). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that for me. I do have one question. Is LinkedIn a reliable source? Tonkarooson (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is rarely, if ever, a reliable source. In this case, it was not. Worse, it was spam for a paid service. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, most of the content had to be removed. See the history page for why[1]. I have notified the main article at Talk:Autism spectrum#Draft:Special interest (autism). — Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh jeez, I didn't know it was like spam! Thank you for letting me know. I am comfortable to the article to be removed, I have another way to see my original text. Is there a way you could give me a small-medium sized list of reliable sources?? Tonkarooson (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, refer to WP:RSP. Medical claims require even better sources per WP:MEDRS, so you may want to not make medical claims at all, if you can help it, before you gain more experience with identifying reliable sources. Best, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is enough on this topic to justify a separate article. Perhaps a concise description can be added to the Other features section of the Autism article - as long as you can include a reference or references that describe what you mean by Special interest. David notMD (talk) 10:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree, you can request that the draft be deleted by putting Db-author at the top, inside double curly brackets {{ }}. Otherwise, if no changes made, in five months you will get a talk message that the draft will be deleted at six months. David notMD (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are saying I should have a sub heading on the original Article, I think it will too big seeing how much I want to add on that topic. What does "other features" supposed to mean exactly? (No hate, I like clarification). Tonkarooson (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Tonkarooson (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least I have time to improve it. This is a lot of helpful info and advice, thank you all of it Guys
I hope I can get lots better and I could get Remembered.
Again, thanks for all the help from everyone on any type of talk page possible 🫰🏼 :D take care now! Tonkarooson (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

At a simple level, you can take a photograph, add it to Wikipedia Commons, then add it to an article. Even that can get tricky. I took a photograph of a work of art. Because the art was copyright protected, my photo was rejected at Commons. Going forward, I hope you find rewarding ways to contribute to Wikipedia. A recommended path is to start with efforts to improve existing articles before another attempt at creating an article. David notMD (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that I should start with something smaller, but I am still going to try to make my original article better with better sources and better vocabulary. I also appreciate all the help I'm getting from so many different people! Thank you everyone, it is so helpful! :D Tonkarooson (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have seen that you have removed K-pop on my edits and I believe that K-Pop is a genre, I think there are good reasons to back this up that may show that K-Pop is a Genre. If there is a policy/guideline that does not label K-Pop as a musical genre, I would like to know this guideline. Thank you. Tonkarooson (talk) 22:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLS

[edit]

Hi Tonkarooson! Thanks for the work you've been doing on the special interest article :D I noticed you left some references as bare URLS. In the visual editor, if you use the automatic citation tool, or click "convert" after putting the link in manually, it will automatically turn it into a full citation for you. -- NotCharizard 🗨 11:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :D (I love this emoticon!)
I just read the bare URLs website and will try my best to use better formatted citations. Just one itty bitty problem about this: I only have been editing on my iPad and my iPhone Pro Max, which uses the source editor that doesn't have that pop up when you type out the "{{". Is there a list of the different types citation templates? Tonkarooson (talk) *new editor* 02:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. I don't really know much about citing with code because I always just do it automatically! Do you mean on the app? I find the app really difficult for editing (it seems to be designed mostly for reading stuff) so I usually just do it in safari. When I go to edit on my phone (iPhone X) in safari, it has an options for both the visual and source editors on the mobile view of the website.
WP:SMARTPHONE has more info on iPads because I don't know much about them. You could try requesting the desktop view in your mobile browser and that might work. -- NotCharizard 🗨 04:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't edit on Safari because of iCloud private relay. I do have a PC and will edit on there when I start a bigger project. Tonkarooson (talk) *new editor* 04:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024: Please only add sourced genres

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Fe!n, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 08:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was not from my own view. If you listen to Playboi Carti's part in Fe!n, you can easily tell that the vocals are incoherent and mumbly. There is a genre for this, it is called "Mumble rap". I have added the genre to Fe!n again and with a reference this time. Tonkarooson (talk) *new editor* 10:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent edit history

[edit]

Hi, regarding your recent edit history, it appears to be vandalism despite being in good faith because your edits are neither sourced nor necessary. Additionally, just because a group or solo artist is Korean, it is NOT enough to label their release as 'K-pop'. Music genres should be based on the style and content of the music, not merely the nationality of the artists. Mislabeling can mislead readers and diminish the accuracy of the information. Therefore, please refrain from making such edits without proper sources and justification. Lililolol (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]