User talk:ToniTurunen

Welcome

Hello, ToniTurunen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is ToniTurunen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ToniTurunen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:ToniTurunen/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ToniTurunen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Great Kung Lao

Hello, ToniTurunen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Great Kung Lao".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:ToniTurunen/sandbox

Hello, ToniTurunen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 20:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Short descriptions should start with a capital letter, please stop mass uncapitalizing them, see WP:SDFORMAT ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Have you looked at the Wikipedia app? It deliberately recommends starting descriptions with a small letter unless the word is a name of course. It follows my logic too, unless you have a full sentence there. The page you linked contradicts with the official app's advice. ToniTurunen (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the capitalization suggested by the android Wikipedia app is wrong, and I have no idea why that is. I also have no idea where to suggest such a thing be fixed. It's not really your fault for believing the official app, to be clear, obviously that's the app's fault. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria De Angelis (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iflaq was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victoria De Angelis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Victoria De Angelis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_signed,Iflaq ^(talk) 01:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mortal Kombat taxonomy

Hello, ToniTurunen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mortal Kombat taxonomy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victoria De Angelis

Hello, ToniTurunen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victoria De Angelis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melungeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Belgian UFO wave have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 14:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mortal Kombat taxonomy

Hello, ToniTurunen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mortal Kombat taxonomy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atte Harjanne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't use emojis in short descriptions (as you did here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here) as they are meant to be written in plain text (see WP:SDFORMAT), thank you! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ToniTurunen. I found your talk page while looking through the edit history at Ostankino Tower, and I saw this edit. I see you were directed to WP:SDFORMAT several days ago but are still adding nonstandard material to short descriptions. Can you please explain why you are making these changes? Replacing standard text with a tiny, difficult to read symbol (diff) or adding a flag into the middle of a city name (diff) doesn't make sense to me. Squeakachu (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. STOP adding typographic dingbats, emojis, or other unicode characters to short descriptions! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of people claimed to be Jesus. You really need to stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly elaborate @Magnolia677. ToniTurunen (talk) 15:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at William Ruto.

Since you still seem to have not gotten the message, as evidenced by repeated and recent disruptive changes: STOP using anything other than plain text, like unicode characters, typographic dingbats, emojis, etc., in short descriptions (see WP:SDFORMAT), as you did here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here or here (all changes made within the last month, after the recent block and previous warnings)! Changes like this are purely disruptive and you will be blocked again, if you don't stop! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, where is this conservative anti-emoji rule written at @Felida97? Willing to co-operate for sure. ToniTurunen (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the page that I linked, WP:SDFORMAT... Do you want me to give you the quote? "Each short description should [...] be written in plain text – without HTML tags, wiki markup, typographic dingbats, emojis, or CSS display manipulation". Also, while I'm glad that you're "willing to co-operate", don't make it sound like this is such an unusual rule or that this is somehow unknown to you. This rule is not any more conservative than the rules for other content on Wikipedia (see MOS:NOICONS), and you have been warned repeatedly (and even blocked) for this disruptive behaviour of yours (those warnings also already referenced WP:SDFORMAT). Literally every short description you've written in anything other than plain text has been reverted or corrected, often with editors remarking on the fact that emojis, etc. are not acceptable in SDs. How has that, the multiple warnings and the block not discouraged you from making those poor SD changes? Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You came across in an inappropriately hostile manner. Well thank you for pointing that out nonetheless because initially emojis were not prohibited from short descriptions. ToniTurunen (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can see that, wasn't entirely unintentional, but sorry about that nonetheless. However, the "plain text" rule has been explicitly mentioned in the same place on the short descriptions page since September 2020. You're correct that emojis were not explicitly mentioned until recently and the simple reason for that is that virtually everyone before you understood what is meant by "plain text"... And again, just to be clear, you have been made aware in mid-February that emojis, etc. are not "plain text", so it's not like this is the first time someone (or even me specifically) has pointed this out to you. Nevertheless, it's great to know that the message got through now and that you'll only write short descriptions in plain text going forward. Consequently, this shall be my last message on your talk page regarding this specific issue. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 12:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]