User talk:TomorrowTime

Welcome!

Hello, TomorrowTime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 17:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Profanity and Foreign profanity

Please take a look at Talk:Profanity#Two_remarks. A vandal had reverted to an old version of Profanity, which was why content was duplicated between the two pages, leading you to replace Foreign profanity with a redirect. I have reverted the redirect for now, although I take no position on whether the articles should be merged (however, see my comment at Talk:List_of_swear_words#Proposed_page_move). If they are not merged, your original (minor) qualm with the article's name should be addressed, perhaps by renaming it to Non-English profanity or some such. Thanks. MarkBrooks 17:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hostess bar

Got your message. I agree -- I don't think the article implies that mama-sans are female pimps, at least it shouldn't. I haven't had time to fix up the article as I've started a new job that keeps me very busy. Perhaps this weekend I can get to it, but what you say is written in the German article sounds appropriate. Also, I agree - the salaryman is a key player (if not the key player) in the whole thing. The article needs a much more sociological outlook. Cheers Drcwright 23:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bakeneko

My bad. I was looking for in text citations. tired, long week. TGIF.--ZayZayEM 06:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kekkai

Hello there, this is just to note that I reverted your edit to the Kekkai article, I hope you don't mind. To answer your question in the change: there are words in english with the same spelling, but completely different (and also unrelated) meanings. We don't delete them from the dictionary for that reason though, do we?

Similarly, in Japanese words exist with completely different meanings, but I assume their romanization is such that they're spelt the same. Take a look at the characters for kekkai (blood homunculus) and kekkai (protective shield). Note that the characters are quite distinct. --132.206.54.86 (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baku (spirit) in Korean

I saw your edit to the Baku article and about the Korean word "maek". I added a comment on the Baku (spirit) talk page that you might want to look at. I think that the "maek" sentence can be removed. Good catch. Timothy Perper (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Comment

Thanks for your comment here. I listed this under Japanese-related AfDs because the article had been rewritten to make the principal claim that it is a title claimed within Asian (and specifically Japanese) Imperial Shinto political culture. This, to my knowledge, is completely erroneous, but it would be useful to have others more knowledgeable weigh in on the debate. Thus your comment, insofar as it addresses the use of this title in that context, is germane and helpful, even if you feel that listing it as a Japan-related AfD was perhaps untoward. Eusebeus (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Evolution. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been close myself on occasion, so I don't hold it against you! Tim Vickers (talk) 22:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Slovenia.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Slovenia. Vabljen! --Yerpo (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jaz se ne bi preveč obremenjeval s strahom da bo POV, sploh če gre za enciklopedične podatke. Sicer pa, kdo bo pisal o slovenskih temah če ne mi? --Yerpo (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk

this is a general message to all concerned, not a personalised response Hello, I have removed opinion based answers to the question on firefighting on the humanities reference desk. Please note that offering opinions can lead to arguments as was beginning to happen on this topic. [1] Sorry for the inconvenience.83.100.251.196 (talk) 11:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TomorrowTime. You have new messages at WP:RD/E.
Message added 06:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─Treasury Tag►draftsman─╢ 06:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Slovenia invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Slovenia? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Slovenia-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Eleassar ^{my talk} 21:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP Japan in the Signpost

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Japan for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lojze Grozde

I answered on 1st part of your questions about Lojze Grozde on its Talk-page. When I have time, I answer on 2nd part of questions. --Stebunik (talk) 09:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

Notices were posted to significant contributors to the articles that a Merge Proposal from Alp (folklore) --> Mare (folklore) is underway. Your feedback is welcomed at Talk:Mare (folklore). Adding your name since you were involved in a previous merge discussion. --Kiyoweap (talk) 01:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yofune-nushi (fictional character)

The article Yofune-nushi (fictional character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable fake folklore figure

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]