User talk:Tomo307

Armidale Secondary College

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for creating a new article. In its present condition Armidale Secondary College has not yet passed our review system. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article advice and if you need any help, don't hesitate to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools or at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Please bear in mind that articles about schools are not automatically accepted. If other editors are now helping to improve this article in order to avoid it being draftified or deleted, please remember to look at the edit summaries in the article history to see what they have done for you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tomo307,

Nice work on Armidale Secondary College. It's helpful to other editors to always add a brief edit summary eg. "date" (minor edit) or "added logo". Gderrin (talk) 03:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some hints on improving articles about schools

Hello again Tomo307,

Thanks again for your work on Armidale Secondary College. In case you are interested in expanding the article, I thought you might find this link useful. (Perhaps give The Armidale School some competition?) Gderrin (talk) 10:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aerial photo of the Armidale Secondary College Campus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aerial photo of the Armidale Secondary College Campus.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Weezer - Autumn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weezer - Autumn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SZNZ: Autumn (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at SZNZ: Autumn instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SZNZ: Autumn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomo307! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sandon Public School

The article Sandon Public School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]