Jump to content

User talk:Tomica/Archive 54

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 50Archive 52Archive 53Archive 54Archive 55Archive 56Archive 60

External music video

Hi Tomica; just asking for the emv on Cry Me a River's Infobox. Every Good article about singles have it, to name some Oops!... I Did It Again (song), Thriller (song), Crazy in Love. I haven't seen a guideline against it, but users supporting it. Like some user told me once, sooner or later the infobox data will be imported straight from Wikidata like this. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey, it's ok, add it. I don't like it because I feel it just makes the infobox longer, but nvm. It's fine :). — Tom(T2ME) 10:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Olly Murs has been nominated for Did You Know

Hi Tomica, how you finding the album? I heart Rita Ora (talk) 15:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey Rita fan! Actually, I am quite surprise, I am listening to it right now for the first time. It's very different, but I like it. It's a step forward for her... — Tom(T2ME) 15:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I agree, when I downloaded it, I was like "F*ck!" I think it's gonna be a good year for females in music (or Roc Nation's females mainly) shame 'bout FourFiveSeconds and the other two not on the album (sorry if I spoiled the suprise!) I thought they would've been on it or the deluxe or at least FourFiveSeconds on Kanye's album (maybe Paul McCartney might take it) glad you're liking it, in your opinion which is your least favourite Rihanna album? (outta curiousity) I heart Rita Ora (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Well, yeah, I am said about the three 2015 babies not being in the album :/. But it's obvious she had a fall out with Kanye, obv that's the reason she didn't include them. This is how I rang Rihanna's 7 albums (excluding Anti atm, it's still growing on me) with 1 being my best!
  1. Rated R
  2. Loud
  3. Good Girl Gone Bad: Reloaded
  4. Unapologetic
  5. Talk That Talk
  6. A Girl like Me
  7. Music of the Sun

Tom(T2ME) 15:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

I was on my phone and had a thick moment, I didn't see excluding Anti and thought, "You're an album short, which one's missing! HA! :) Mine's like this:
  1. Music of the Sun, love it's reggae, dancehall, R&B sound, reminds me of the '00s.
  2. A Girl like Me, more growth in Rihanna a bit more pop and R&B-y compared to Music of the Sun.
  3. Good Girl Gone Bad, when Umbrella came out I was like no reggae :(! But it's dance-pop, hip-hop and R&B hybrid was amazing
  4. Rated R, it's mix of R&B, hip-hop, pop, dubstep, rock and reggae was amazing (I think it's more hip-hop/R&B than pop/rock and I like it, one of the best '09 albums for me if I had to choose my top three of 2009 it would be Mariah Carey's Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel at number one followed by Rated R and Eminem's Recovery as third)
  5. Loud, we saw Miss. Pissed Off Rihanna with Rated R and now we see Miss. Happy Rihanna, I love how it has so many sounds be it pop, R&B, dance, hip hop, rock. She looked fit (I'm a bloke) with the red hair
  6. Unapologetic, BEST ARTWORK EVER! The album was pretty amazing too!
  7. Talk That Talk, was a bit too much like Loud, infact I would say almost a carbon copy of Loud, got both the standard and deluxe copies.
  8. Anti, Wait Your Turn should've been recorded for it as the album opener, the echoy "The wait is over, the wait is over!" would've been funny. My only negative is I wish she did release the Kanye West version of the album too to compare it to the real Anti.

All in all a good choice too :) I heart Rita Ora (talk) 15:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually I change my mind, for me it's in my top 5 Rihanna albums! XD! How's you? I heart Rita Ora (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I love it! Right now I am thinking it's #2, just behind Rated R, that one is a true masterpiece for me! — Tom(T2ME) 10:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Didn't she say she wanted to make a vintage album like Rated R? She's done her fans proud. I heart Rita Ora (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tomica, Smoovez (previously known before I changed it as I heart Rita Ora) here, can you please do me a huge favour? on Summer Sixteen can you just see why I keep getting in red an issue with check date when I'm sure I did it right? Many thanks Smoovez (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
@Smoovez: Done. When you do the dd/mm/yyyy format you don't add any commas as in the mm/dd/yyyy. ;) — Tom(T2ME) 13:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Ta, very muchy, how's Anti for ya now? Smoovez (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Russian Roulette's source

That is an actual correct reference from the book, my 11 year old brother has that book, just thought you should know 188.223.72.34 (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Anti (album)

I don't really know why you insist on writing something that makes no sense. What on Earth does it have to do with WP:CRYSTALBALL? The numbers are already out on Nielsen (therefore it is not something to be released in the future), which is why HipHopDX and Billboard reported numbers. Hzh (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Show me the official Nielsen report and maybe I will believe. WP:CRYSTALBALL is that HipHopDX has an account on Nielsen. — Tom(T2ME) 10:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
So you are saying HipHopDX invents numbers they reported every week? WOW! If you look at other sites that report sales figures every week, and given that the number of album sold is too low to appear on sales-only chart according to Billboard, how much do you think the album has sold? Hzh (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't think or want to think anything until I see the full week sales. I am sure Billboard will elaborate there everything. And yes, I do not believe 100% in HipHopDX. — Tom(T2ME) 10:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Billboard has already elaborated, I've given you links, it says only a few sales, not enough to make sales-only chart. You claimed that the number is faked, but you gave no evidence at all, and you used the Forbes site that makes no such claim (and is actually quite ignorant of how numbers are calculated). On what evidence do you claim that the source is "unnamed"? Why do you make insinuation against sites that give regular sales report? Hzh (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Note also WP:CRYSTALBALL is about future event, please do not cite reason that is completely irrelevant. Hzh (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I would just add for your information that websites are not allowed to give detailed Nielsen's figures without Nielsen's consent. Those that do without explicit Nielsen's consent will be told to remove their pages, therefore for HipHopDX to report sales figures every week, they need to have a Nielsen account and permission to publish. Other sites however may use those figures already reported by officially sanctioned sites such as HipHipDX. Nielsen normally would not bother if a website publishes a few numbers, but for more detailed numbers like HipHipDX, they do clamp down. Even forums have been told to ban people who post detailed Nielsen figures not published in legitimate websites. Hzh (talk) 12:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Super Bowl 49 Halftime Show

You reverted my edit wherein I corrected the portion about the animal Katy Perry was on to be a lion, not a tiger. I'm not good with the intricacies of in-line citations, and you appear to be much more active than I am. Here's an article written about the process to create the lion, where the company who built it are profiled. Perhaps you can cite it in the article, since If I tried it, I'd screw it up. http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2015/02/super_bowl_audience_focuses_on.html 208.40.242.43 (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Only Girl (In the World)

I've made three reverts now. Clearly a sock of MariaJaydHickey.  — Calvin999 11:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I can't believe how annoying s/he is! Why don't just give up? I am gonna revert now... — Tom(T2ME) 12:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I've opened a sock investigation into these IP addresses.  — Calvin999 12:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
All of them should be blocked indefinitely! — Tom(T2ME) 12:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 17:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I thought P came before R in the genres? Destinyclarker (talk) 12:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm unable to change it as it's locked can you please change it to pop then R&B for me? Destinyclarker (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronan Keating - Time of My Life.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronan Keating - Time of My Life.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Little mix wings.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little mix wings.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Tomica, would you be kind enough to leave some comments for the above peer review? I would be glad to have your thoughts and opinions on the article as it is the first of its kind in that subject. —IB [ Poke ] 16:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I will definitely check it out. I just remembered you asked me while ago, but I totally forgot. No worries, you gonna have your review very soon! — Tom(T2ME) 16:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Nice userpage!

The Userpage Barnstar
Your userpage is one of the best I have seen on Wikipedia, so I wanted to give you this. Peter Sam Fan | talk 23:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
@Peter SamFan: Wow. Thank you. Haven't expected this. Glad you like it! Cheers. — Tom(T2ME) 23:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. I like giving out barnstars, BTW. Peter Sam Fan | talk 15:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronan Keating - Time of My Life.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronan Keating - Time of My Life.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Mentioned

Hello, just a note that I mentioned you by implication in the discussion thread User talk:Jimbo Wales#Sponsorship and product placement. However, there is no need to participate in the thread if you do not find it relevant or meaningful. MPS1992 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Since you are an avid editor of Adele-related articles, just wanted to inform you about the GA nomination of "All I Ask". Feel free to make any rectifications you want, pre-review. ;) Also, very excited about the WerQ video!! Thanks.--MaranoFan (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: Nice work. Since I am kind of lazy these days I am just gonna write some suggestions here:
  • Commercial performances should go before Live performances
  • Please add the full credits, here is the booklet
  • Maybe you can mention in the lead that the Grammy performance experienced technical difficulties ?
  • Be 100% sure you are using British English
  • And you may add some of the expanded credits in the prose.
Other than this the article is well shaped and nicely written :). — Tom(T2ME) 14:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I just got an influx of hounds at the review page, see Talk:Billy the Kid#GA review for more context. How to handle this now is beyond me. Advice?--MaranoFan (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

TFA

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda Arendt, thank you so much! :) — Tom(T2ME) 16:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SOS - Rihanna.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SOS - Rihanna.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Someone has changed the genres and added insignificant details about dancehall, I'm new and I see that you're big into Rihanna can you revert their edit on it please? 3LWfan (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for List of songs recorded by Olly Murs

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Connecticut Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions), Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), and New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by There's always time for skeletons Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with Lancashire J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Drink You Away

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Drink You Away you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Azealia911 -- Azealia911 (talk) 07:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, could you review this list which I intent to nominate for FL. I had submitted it for peer review and received some comments from a user. He suggested me to call for more reviews from other users. --Inside the Valley (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SOS - Rihanna.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SOS - Rihanna.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Anti

Quick question, I don't mean for it to sound nasty, how comes when I put recording artist you change it back to singer when all her other albums say Barbadian recording artist? 3LWfan (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

IMO recording artist is a very vague term. I have used it in the past, but I really think 'singer' is much more better. Because, recording artist sounds like she has recorded the music only, singer is more appropriate honestly. — Tom(T2ME) 16:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
OK sure do you want me to change the others or you doing it? 3LWfan (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
You can change them. :)) Thanks in advance. — Tom(T2ME) 16:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Done and dusted 3LWfan (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)