User talk:Tom Butler

Out numbered by masked editors with way too much time on their hands and no social skills

If you need to contact me, the email feature works here or please use the contact Tom Butler tool on my personal website. Tom Butler (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can be found in Citizendium Tom Butler (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Goblin Face (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with words like slander

Accusing Wikipedia editors of slander could be considered a violation of WP:NLT - I'd suggest caution and restraint with the use of such language. Simonm223 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That would be rather hypocritical of me since I just agreed with two other editors that the discussion was happening at the wrong venue. And for a warning like this there's nothing out of place with going to your talk page - it is, after all, a space that gives you a bit more privacy with the warning and I wasn't trying to turn this into a bigger fight. Again, simply suggesting caution and restraint using language that could be construed as a legal threat. Simonm223 (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Enforcement

There is a thread at Arbitration enforcement which concerns you. Second Quantization (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic banned from Rupert Sheldrake in accordance with the terms at WP:TBAN

You have been sanctioned per this arbitration enforcement request

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Words

Hi, I was just reading your comment over at User_talk:PhiChiPsiOmega#Futility and found some parts hard to understand until I realised you meant these words. [1] [2] [3] Hope this is useful. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it appears I fat-fingered the keyboard. I assume you got the drift of the message, though. Tom Butler (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tom Butler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]