User talk:Tolly4bolly/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tolly4bolly. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

Traffic report: Reddit creep

Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

A cheeseburger for you!

Looks like were the sole fighters at Boss $oHƎM❊^{আড্ডা} 08:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 11:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

why is the photo not showing?

Hey, I just uploaded the pic to the page why is it not showing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.180.114 (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

You have to upload that image on wikipedia before your image can be shown on the article. Tolly 4 bolly 07:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Why is the picture removed?

? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaishnavi.sinha123 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

Traffic report: Reddit creep

Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

Screens count of a Bollywood film’s release needed.

Every Bollywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gunaah (1993 film), Torreslfchero!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm FrankDev. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jilla(2013 film), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, FrankDev

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Danrok. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, India-Ethiopia relations, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Danrok

change in my profile

i changed an adress in my profile form current to new one (edit) petarbasic1@gmail.com since i don't use that one any more

thx

59.90.186.230 would like to know why you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ?

would like to know why have you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ? the page points to a board game site where you can play the game with your facebook friends. i can change the description and put a new one if you suggest , or is it not allowed to put such links. please let me know . the site is clean and not a malware you can see and try it for yourself. Thanks,

Reverted change to Oy Vey

You reverted my change to the Oy Vey article after I conferred with one of my Jewish/hispanic coleagues and she confirmed it.

Your uneducated and moronic edit

What kind of idiot are you to ruin a good article on Jays' Treaty? Someone took the time and effort to write an accurate account of the issues between the US and Britain, and their resolutions and you decided on being a complete moron and ruined it.

The remove RottenTomatoes as well. Reply to TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

If you don't know, that that dosent mean that a site dosent exist.

If you apply the same rule you can remove 'rottentomatoes.com' as well, they also """attempting leech off the value of other sites""" as per your remark (ie reviews from various sites) Will you do that? Can you do that?

There has to be a common benchmark.

When did Wikipedia turn unfair and biased?

I have always come across good people in wiki.

First entry for project I am really interested in and it is messed up

Thank you for your kind welcome. I find it most interesting that you work on the Indian Cinema pages and you welcomed me. (I am listening to ″Aja Soniye″) as I am writing this and I watch mainly Indian movies.) Anyway, I added my name to the project list for Indian Cinema, saved, got reminded to write an edit note, did that, saved, looked at the page in real-time and it is messed up and I don't know why which is embarrassing because I have been a programmer and I have worked in the IT field for a very long time. I will appreciate any help you can give me.

Regards,

--Norawashere (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I fixed it!! Norawashere (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

In the media: Manning "put back in the closet"; State involvement in Azerbaijani Wikipedia

News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up

Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds

Discussion report: Arbcom election procedures, Wiki Loves Monuments, Privacy policy, FDC, and more

Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt

WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia

Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion

Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

In the media: Lawyer goes to court to discover Wikipedian's identity; Storming Wikipedia; Wikimedia UK Secretary in conflict-of-interest controversy; Does Wikipedia need a "right to reply" box?

WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia

Featured content: Tintin goes featured

News and notes: As deadline approaches, Individual Engagement Grants looks for ideas

Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!

Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
719	Nagma (talk)	Add sources
791	Shammi Kapoor (talk)	Add sources
1,078	Silk Smitha (talk)	Add sources
163	Darbhanga (talk)	Add sources
29	54th Filmfare Awards (talk)	Add sources
34	Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa (soundtrack) (talk)	Add sources
7,141	Satyagraha (film) (talk)	Cleanup
411	Anurag Basu (talk)	Cleanup
247	Prakash Raj filmography (talk)	Cleanup
1,001	S. P. Balasubrahmanyam (talk)	Expand
375	A. L. Vijay (talk)	Expand
494	Shaka Laka Boom Boom (talk)	Expand
132	Prachanda (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,159	Mahesh Bhatt (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
130	Sukumari (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
425	Red Chillies Entertainment (talk)	Merge
266	Aashiq Banaya Aapne (talk)	Merge
137	Puli (film) (talk)	Merge
33	Coimbatore Mappillai (talk)	Wikify
181	Shweta Pandit (talk)	Wikify
434	Upen Patel (talk)	Wikify
2	Pothumarru (talk)	Orphan
19	Ancestral Home (talk)	Orphan
3	Abia de la Obispalía Castle (talk)	Orphan
5	Mathrubhumi Film Awards (talk)	Stub
25	Vallarasu (talk)	Stub
43	Khoon Pasina (talk)	Stub
74	Sibi Malayil (talk)	Stub
3	Peravali (talk)	Stub
16	BIG Television Awards (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
51	Gheevarghese Mar Gregorios of Parumala (talk)	Add sources
256	Chandan Prabhakar (talk)	Add sources
52	Screen Awards (talk)	Add sources
543	Mohan (actor) (talk)	Add sources
740	Comedy Circus (talk)	Add sources
534	Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa (talk)	Add sources
221	Sridevi filmography (talk)	Cleanup
160	Nadunisi Naaygal (talk)	Cleanup
22	Kavithalayaa Productions (talk)	Cleanup
1,897	Madhubala – Ek Ishq Ek Junoon (talk)	Expand
871	Don 2 (talk)	Expand
725	Shatrughan Sinha (talk)	Expand
15	Master Vinayak (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
481	Dhoom (film series) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
144	Madan Mohan (music director) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17	Sophia College, Mumbai (talk)	Merge
124	Anjan Dutt (talk)	Merge
2	Stardust Award for Film of the Year (talk)	Merge
14	Nimmakuru (talk)	Wikify
88	Daniel Balaji (talk)	Wikify
24	Roopa Iyer (talk)	Wikify
0	Ainpur (talk)	Orphan
2	Antonio Ladislao Alcantara (talk)	Orphan
2	Antonio Valladares de Sotomayor (talk)	Orphan
319	Vimala Raman (talk)	Stub
142	Priya Raman (talk)	Stub
17	Sawaal (film) (talk)	Stub
13	Cinema Express Awards (talk)	Stub
14	Arayannangalude Veedu (talk)	Stub
6,072	Naiyaandi (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)