This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
I've reverted some edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Red_Chillies_Entertainment&diff=prev&oldid=1238745062] and subsequently asked for the revisions to be deleted as most of the material was a direct copy-paste from RCE's website. Aside from that problem, the edit was mostly based on the companies website, so Wikipedia:PRIMARY sources. Those are allowed, but for basic facts - a paragraph promotional blurb about a sub-entity is not a basic fact. Number of employees, leadership change - all valid uses. Good quality secondary sources (and not paid / sponsored articles, WP:NEWSORGINDIA) would be needed for these to show notability, and needs to be written in a WP:NPOV manner. The two secondary sources used in the article are not acceptable - studylib is an upload site with User Generated Content and not an acceptable source, while Mbaskool is a blog with the same issues around UGC. Ravensfire (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this needs an overall rewrite. Instead of me just culling the unsourced and promotional content, I will take a stab at cleaning it up, rewriting, and seeing if there are better reliable secondary sources. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
