User talk:Toby.Clarke20

September 2023

Hello, I'm Blakegripling ph. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Madeline (1998 film), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Blake Gripling (talk) 15:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sorry Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though I Don’t Know Where To Find A Source For It, I Know Hatty Jones Definitely Did Audition And Lost The Role Of Hermione Granger In The Harry Potter (Film Series) To Emma Watson. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't add it if you can't find a reliable source. —El Millo (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but how can I find a reliable source then? Also how do I delete messages on Wikipedia? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Reliable sources. Any news article by any reputable site is a reliable source, such as Variety or The Hollywood Reporter, since you're editing film articles. But please familiarize yourself with how this works before continuing adding stuff to articles. Also, now you may encounter unreliable sources and your content will still be reverted, and rumors are not included in Wikipedia. —El Millo (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won’t put that back on ever again, I refuse to. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won’t, I’ll never do it again, I promise, but how do I find a reliable source then? What should I do? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think I’ll edit anything again, so don’t worry, I’ll stop from now on, so you don’t need to think about it anymore. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get discouraged, it just takes a little time to get good at it. —El Millo (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that’s fine. I Can Hopefully Get Good At It At Some Point, I Just Need Yo Know. But For Now, I Won’t Edit Anything, I Promise. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just let you be now, but I was only referring to the unsourced additions. You can still fix anything you see spelled wrong, rewrite anything you think is poorly written, etc. —El Millo (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I just edited everything that I wrote that was unsourced, but if there’s anything written wrongly or poorly, I’ll edit it just to let you know! Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Also Removed everything I wrote that was unsourced as well actually except for one that you edited for me. btw thanks for that because those are obviously unsourced and shouldn’t be on there. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I’m very sorry for editing lots of things too on Wikipedia I promise I’ll never do that again. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I’ll stop editing Wikipedia pages for now! Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could I Use A Reliable Source Called Mirror That Mentions Hatty Jones Lost The Role Of Hermione To Emma Watson Or Should I Just Only Use Websites Like Variety And The Hollywood Reporter? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I Just Found A Website Called THERICHEST which mentions In 15 Actors That Were Almost Cast In Harry Potter that Hatty Jones Was Too Old To Play Hermione. So, If I Go Back And Edit On The Philosopher’s Stone, How Can I Paste THERICHEST Website 15 Actors That Were Almost Cast In Harry Potter Thing Article In The Thing With The Number [181] Which Talks About The Article Of Jones Losing The Hermione To Watson? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, If I Edit The Page For The BFG (2016 Film), could I just write that Chris Columbus was attached to direct the film according to his Wikipedia list of unrealized projects, or should I get the Reliable Source that mentions about it? I tried using the reliable source of Chris Columbus’ involvement in the BFG, but it didn’t work. How can I make the reliable source work so it can proof it was actually real? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to their About Us page, they seem not to have an editorial team or policy, which would make it an unreliable source. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources#List of potential resources, where reliable sources on film are listed. Of course there are more reliable sources than those listed there, but that's a start and those are the most reliable ones. —El Millo (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, But I Know Variety Is A Reliable Source, And It Mentions Chris Columbus’ Involvement With The BFG, So How Can I Paste The Reliable Source Of The BFG (2016) Film To Proof It Was Actually Real? Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 07:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Think Now I’ll Just Edit Anything Written Wrongly Or Poorly! Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 09:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, just saw something got edited, unsourced and unexplained, I won’t write it ever again, I promise! Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Sorry, I Won’t Ever Do That Again, I Promise. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 07:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Facts About Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Facts About Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wikishovel (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry I Won’t Ever Add It Again, I Promise Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 13:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–2009) (Page 10)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–2009) (Page 10). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–2020). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–2020). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 17:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I Won’t Ever Add It Again, I Promise. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Cameron Movies moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kyle Cameron Movies. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 11:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I Won’t Do It Ever Again Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 11:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I Saw Something Else Like Terry Gilliam Unmade Projects That I Oastrd From The Original Got Deleted. I Won’t Ever Do It Again, I Promise. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I Won’t Do Anthing Else On Here Ever Again, I Promise. Toby.Clarke20 (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2024 film)

Hello, Toby.Clarke20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2024 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.