User talk:Tmmonir

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Welcome

Hello, Tmmonir, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Tmmonir, good luck, and have fun. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 16:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tmmonir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Zyter, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 17:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Various drafts of Zyter

The article you created, Zyter, was not ready for the encyclopedia, so I moved it to Draft:Zyter. 1) It was difficult to tell if it was "notable" as Wikipedia defines the term, more on that later, and 2) It was written like an advertisement, meaning it would have been eligible for speedy deletion as spam had I not moved it.

In any case, it will NOT be accepted into the main encyclopedia until BOTH issues are resolved. The "notability" issue is the most important - if the topic you are writing about is not considered "notable" then no article, no matter how well written, will be accepted. Please read WP:My first article and any content-related links you see there, particularly those that discuss "notability."

Also, your "user" page, User:Tmmonir, should not be used for drafting articles. I moved that page to a sub-page, User:Tmmonir/Zyter-10:20, 31 December 2020. See WP:User pages for more information about the proper use of your main "user page" and the proper use of user sub-pages. If you no longer need this page, simply replace its contents with {{db-author}}. If you do it right, the page will look similar to what you see at the top of Template:db-author.

Your sandbox, User:Tmmonir/sandbox, is currently blank because you blanked it. However, there are older versions of "Zyter" drafts in its edit history should you need them. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 18:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like some versions were deleted as "spam" or as copyright violations. IF this company IS notable, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those that talk about content, editing with a conflict of interest, and the purpose of Wikipedia, before starting over. If the topic is not "notable" by Wikipedia standards, then pick another topic to write about. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 18:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zyter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zyter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blablubbs|talk 18:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tmmonir/Zyter 13:24, 5 January 2021

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Tmmonir/Zyter 13:24, 5 January 2021, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://michaeldonner.medium.com/rockville-md-company-wins-50-industry-awards-for-covid-19-solutions-339d04ba50b. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blablubbs|talk 18:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Tmmonir/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Tmmonir/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Tmmonir/Zyter-10:20, 31 December 2020

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Tmmonir/Zyter-10:20, 31 December 2020 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing notice

Hello Tmmonir. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tmmonir. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tmmonir|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tmmonir There is no compensation for my edits since its a request from my associate but not paid. Love to edit/add for my own skill improvement but no intentional ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zytereditor (talk • contribs) 20:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tmmonir: If you receive any financial compensation or other tangible benefit from anyone else, or expect to do so in the future for work done now, that would be considered paid editing. Even if you do not, if you are doing things at the direction of someone else ("its a request from my associate") and that person would be considered a paid editor if he were making the edit, then consider yourself a paid editor. Even if neither of you would be considered "paid editors" it looks like you or your associate - and thereby you because you are editing at his request - have a strong conflict of interest. In cases like this, it is much better if editors edit as if they were paid editors even if they are not. This means always using the articles for creation process for drafts and always using Template:Requested edit template to request changes of content to actual articles. It also means being very transparent about your conflict of interest - paid or not - on your user page and on the talk pages of related articles (the Template:Connected contributor and Template:Connected contributor (paid) templates are useful for this purpose). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC) (Struck - while what I said IS true, I said it to Tmmonir on the assumption that he, not Zytereditor, wrote the message immediately above, "There is no compensation.... ... no intentional ad.") davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to requote a portion of the above; if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are... (emphasis mine) engaging in paid editing. You have a request from an associate, i.e. a co-worker, of your employer. This, to me, sounds like the very definition of "broadly construed". You are being asked to perform a task for work directly related to your employer. Regardless, you are in a position in which your neutrality is compromised. You need to read and thoroughly understand our conflict of interest guideline. Your edits to date, for example on Draft:Zyter, clearly show you have such a conflict of interest and are engaging in edits intended to advertise for the company. This is flatly unacceptable here. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. More than a quarter of a million companies before yours have attempted to use Wikipedia for advertising purposes and have been prevented from doing so. There are very strong reasons for that. What you are attempting to do here will not work. You can not use Wikipedia for the purposes of promoting your company. I hope I've been clear. If you have questions, I'll be happy to answer. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft, Thank you for such an excellent explanation. I understand and keep in mind the conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmmonir (talk • contribs) 12:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... For Construction Pros

4. Industry Awards and Recognition

2020 Business Award, Gold, The SVUS (Silicon Valley United States) Awards® Winner in 2019 Fierce Innovation Awards, Telecom Edition, IoT Category, hosted by Questex

The Zyter COVID-19 Suite won the following awards in 2020: Gold Awards · Best Health Care and Medical Innovation (PR World Awards) · Startup of the Year Tmmonir (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First, declare any conflict of interest, paid or not. Second, awards generally do not help a subject satisfy our criteria for inclusion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some helpful information

You might find WP:Notifications and WP:Signatures helpful. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zyter (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zyter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zyter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bjelleklang - talk 22:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmmonir! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bjelleklang - talk 22:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]