User talk:Tlinse
Hello, Tlinse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "
" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Your submission at AfC List of Contemporary Writers of the American West was accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 20:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Nomination of List of Contemporary Writers of the American West for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Contemporary Writers of the American West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Contemporary Writers of the American West until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jsharpminor (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Message
[edit]Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I saw one of your notes talking about frustrations with some editors. Please don't get discouraged, some editors does not equal all editors. Editing here is a learning curve, even for long time editors, and often we learn with every edit, and reading the edit summaries. But it should be an enjoyable learning curve. This is probably the greatest collaborative effort in human history, and you are lucky to be involved in something like that, that's for sure. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hand to heart! Encouragement is so appreciated! I believe strongly in the mission and do feel lucky to be involved! Again, thank you! Tlinse (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)