Jump to content

User talk:Tkovack1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Tkovack1, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! JoannaSerah (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

April 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kidz Bop 21. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carowinds, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will stop. I do not want to be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Tkovack1 (talk) 13:41 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Tkovack1, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Otterathome (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will stop my disruptive editing. I do not want to be blocked from editing. I disagree about the page Tkovack1 being inappropriate. Thank you. Tkovack1 (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon::==( o ) 18:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkovack1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was trying to approve Wikipedia more but I didn't know that it was inappropriate. Tkovack1 (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block. Wanting to improve Wikipedia is not a valid reason for abusing multiple accounts. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkovack1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Tkovack2 registered on the same computer. I tried to tell him to stop with his disruptive editing, but he didn't listen to me. Tkovack1 (talk) 22:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seriously expect us to believe that someone editing from the same computer with a sequential username, editing some of the same pages you've edited, is a different person? Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkovack1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Tkovack2 is a different person and copied my username when he registered Wikipedia. Tkovack1 (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Excuse my bluntness, but don't piss on our legs and tell us it's raining. Actually, you won't be again, since I'm cutting off access to this talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: Tkovack1 makes this edit at 13:52; Tkovack2 is created on the same IP, same computer, at 13:54; all edits from either of them have been from the same two IPs and same computer. Weigh this as you think appropriate. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]