User talk:Timothy Clemans/Archive 1

This talk page has been blanked. I will not archive the pages to this point. I will continue to blank the old stuff up to this date without archiving it. There are posts about blanking this page(blanked out), but I continue to blank it. Timothy Clemans 07:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atmospheric sciences portal

I've been slowly adding bits to the atmospheric sciences portal you began on 4 February. Hopefully it will catch on and grow, though it does have a lot of redundancy with portals like weather, atmosphere, tropical cyclones, etc. Major wikiprojects under the umbrella of atmospheric sciences are climate change as well as tropical cyclones which is more of a standardization project (which is very active in vastly improving the tropical cyclone information on Wikipedia).

Also, it is preferred that you archive your talk page when you want to clear it. Evolauxia 05:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have done good work on the atmospheric sciences portal. Thank you for vastly improving it. Timothy Clemans 07:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Flannery

That's fine, although I would note that we don't normally list as "See also" items that are already linked in the article text. --Michael Snow 01:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen See also that list links already in the article and red links. Timothy Clemans 18:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you live in Iowa? Jedi6 03:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you asking? Timothy Clemans 19:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I might know you. There are a lot of Clemans though. Jedi6 -(need help?) 23:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not live there. Timothy Clemans 02:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NOVA scienceNOW does exist now

I haven't had time to edit it as well as I usually do. Right now it contains little more than a list of episode titles and descriptions (taken from the scienceNOW website?). I might have time to expand it further this weekend, but for now you might want to post a request at Wikipedia:Requests for expansion. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

otheruses template on "number" article

I saw you removed the {{otheruses}} tempate from the Number article. I think that was a mistake. Number (disambiguation) exists, and points to articles that people may be looking for when they type "number" into the search box. {{otheruses}} is a very nice, minimally obtrusive mechanism for helping users find what they're looking for. --Trovatore 01:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IP being block may be problem

It could very well be that the IP has been Autoblocked. I understand that the Wiki brass has to deal with vandals; however, they probably need to rethink their approach. "Don't throw the baby out with the bath water." Hokeman 01:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

personal sandbox

As you already know, personal pages working pages are encouraged. Blank pages in the (Main) namespace, eg. Prime number/finding are definitely not wanted. -- RHaworth 10:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wilesatblackboard.jpeg

You claim this image to be in the public domain, but the site you took it from makes no such release. Their terms of use offer no provision for reuse, so we need a fair use claim or a different, freely licensed image. Night Gyr 22:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Wiles

I see that you've made a lot of changes. Let me read them--I'll get back to you tomorrow. NatusRoma | Talk 02:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I still see some rewriting work to do. I think I need to add more stuff. Thanks, again. Timothy Clemans 02:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. I look forward to seeing what you can make of the article in four months' time. NatusRoma | Talk 03:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]