User talk:Timelash

July 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mizzy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. CT55555(talk) 19:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source of the video where he did it in the activities tab with a link of a reuploaded tiktok video of him doing it Timelash (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. I've reverted it. Please stop. We need to cite things to reliable sources (See link above). Especially biographical information (see WP:BLP and especially allegations of criminality. (see WP:CRIME).

I'll be very surprised if you find any reliable source confirming that he has been found guilty of theft in a court of law. Until you do, stop adding such content to the article. CT55555(talk) 19:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You appear to be adding your own commentary and random thoughts to Wikipedia without a regard to providing reliable sources. Please stop. — Trey Maturin™ 16:38, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 2nd one is not a random thought. Gay is a term used to describe a homosexual man. Lesbian is a term used to describe a homosexual woman. Homosexual is a romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or gender. Timelash (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You changed it from “person” to “man or boy”, which, just like you just wrote above, is incorrect. This is a problem. It appears that you’re typing the first random thought that comes into your head without evidence. — Trey Maturin™ 10:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at article Lesbian, you can see that it says “woman or girl”, not “person”. So Gay refers to “man or boy”, not “person”. So i will change it and add a source saying the definition of “gay” Timelash (talk) 12:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "lesbian" refers only to female-identifying people. But "gay" refers to all homosexual people, of which "gay men" are a subset (for instance "gay rights" means rights for all gay people, not "gay men's rights", which would be a completely different thing). That you don't appear to understand this piece of ordinary common knowledge is concerning if you're going to edit in such an area. — Trey Maturin™ 12:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It might be useful if you looked 5 lines further up the article at this disambiguation notice:

As a queer person, my advice to you would be to read the articles linked in that template to get a better understanding about the subject before you pepper articles on queer terminology with your random thoughts. Thanks. — Trey Maturin™ 12:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mizzy, you may be blocked from editing. Metro is not a reliable source. See WP:METRO and WP:RS CT55555(talk) 13:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about the X (formerly Twitter) source? I see some articles using sources from X. Timelash (talk) 22:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TWITTER answers that. Basically it can be used in a narrow set of circumstances for non controversial biographical information that people share about themselves.

If you want to keep editing and not get blocked, read WP:RS and only add content from reliable sources. Learn what reliable sources are. CT55555(talk) 22:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla So is my account and ip address actually going to be permanently banned? And what should I do next? Should I just create a new account and start from scratch? Or will I get unbanned from Wikipedia? Timelash (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see no path forward for you, but you are free to contest your block. WP:GAB explains how. You are not permitted to edit Wikipedia, whether via a new account or any other way, until this block is lifted. The block applies to you personally. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So is this ban going to be applied to my account permanently? Or will it be reconsidered some time in the future? Timelash (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The block is indefinite. It will only be reconsidered when you make an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timelash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry that was probably my brother who made the edits on the @mizzyhater account. I am a mizzy fan but he is however a hater and chooses to spread hate on mizzy. The other account @Pornhub2023 was used by me to make other edits to the articles because my main was getting flagged as I apparently made “disruptive and unreliable sourced edits”. Not every single edit requires a source that is “reliable”. Only the important ones need them. I am able to edit on fandom with no problem. No need for any source. So I made that new account to have a fresh start but my username for the new account was apparently not appropriate for wikipedia even though wikipedia allows this username for account creation and etc. I was not aware that using multiple accounts was not allowed. Also why do you have to block every account on an ip address if people unrelated to it does little to nothing wrong? We have people that use the same wifi as us such as siblings, parents and guests that sometimes come over to the house that could possibly misuse anything and then everybody on the wifi gets punished for it. This reminds me of Kim Jong Un. Someone did something wrong so lets punish the whole family and 3 generations from that too.

Decline reason:

Yes, see WP:LITTLEBROTHER. You seem to think fandom and wikipedia have the same policies. Nope. Yamla (talk) 21:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timelash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the Wikipedia Administrators, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account, username: Timelash. I understand that my account was blocked due to continuous edits that I now realize were against Wikipedia guidelines, and the suspicion of creating multiple fake accounts. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere apologies for any disruption my actions may have caused within the Wikipedia community. It was never my intention to violate the rules, and I deeply regret my actions. I have since familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies to ensure such errors are not repeated. Regarding the suspicion of creating multiple fake accounts, I want to clarify that I have only ever operated under the username "Timelash." I am committed to maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia platform and have no interest in participating in any fraudulent activities. To prevent any future misunderstandings, I am dedicated to following Wikipedia's editing policies and guidelines diligently. I am more than willing to learn from my past mistakes and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. I kindly request the reconsideration of the block on my account and the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to following Wikipedia's rules and contributing constructively. If necessary, I am open to any restrictions or mentorship as suggested by the administrators to ensure that I can become a responsible and valuable Wikipedia editor. Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to a positive resolution to this matter. Sincerely, Timelash Timelash (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I get the sense that you may have written this with an AI. Please write in your own words. I would also suggest that you read WP:MEAT; even if you yourself haven't operated multiple accounts, you concede others at your residence have, that's meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timelash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has now been almost 4 months since I was permanently banned and I have not edited on wikipedia since. I apologize for the stuff I did in the past and I will try to make better edits and only use this one account. Will you unban me since I haven’t done anything for almost 4 months?

Decline reason:

Per below; TPA revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Timelash (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to accounts including TrollKings and I love Nigger and NlGGER-HATER and We Hate LGBTQ. I'm not going to decline this unblock request, but very, very clearly, Wikipedia isn't the place for this person. --Yamla (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Frankly, I don't believe the claims you made in your email. In any case, I won't be lifting this block. Please don't contact me by email again. In fact, you shouldn't be emailing anyone. WP:UTRS is available to you, though it'll be an utter waste of time unless you've gone at least six months with zero edits and are willing to honestly address your behaviour (see WP:SO). --Yamla (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should, however, note that UTRS appeal #82862 almost certainly was not made by this user. That part, I believe. --Yamla (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]