User talk:Time River

Welcome

Hi Time River, and welcome to Wikipedia! I just saw your excellent work on social trap. I helped out a little with how to add a page to multiple categories; see the difference here. I also changed the category Category:Psychology to a bit more specific Category:Social psychology, do you think that's correct?

Hope you'll continue to write here! You might find the Psychology WikiProject interesting. Don't hesitate to write on my talk page if you have any questions. /skagedal^... 01:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I wrote a reply here. /skagedal^... 11:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of GOSH! Magazine

I have nominated GOSH! Magazine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOSH! Magazine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 12:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Michael Zinzun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited The Other Side of the Wind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Hunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Other Side of the Wind

Hi, thanks for your additions to The Other Side of the Wind, especially the reference to the American Cinematographer article, which I haven't read. Just a couple of thoughts:

I'm pretty sure that the Arizona house wasn't instead of the Arizona studios you cite, but as well as it - there are lots of references to their renting out a private ranch-house for many of the ranch scenes, and Gary Graver tells a story about the neighbours complaining about the filming at the ranch house. (I'll post that shortly.) Since they shot some ranch scenes at Peter Bogdanovich's house, and in France and Spain, it looks like there were lots of different locations used.
I put quite a lot of effort into getting an accurate cast list order, based on the prominence of the parts in the shooting script; I hope you don't mind if I revert the order from the alphabetical order, which is only given on IMDB simply because they have less information avalable. One of the points made by Joseph McBride is that the lack of any reliable single source on this film has long enabled people who had short cameos to claim that they had major starring parts! Debonairchap (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry about that. I reverted it back to your cast list. My apologies. I also streamlined the section about the Arizona shooting and re-added a sentence about the ranch house you mentioned, in case you want to add something about that. Time River (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I fixed it with Dab solver. I hope I did it right.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jay Silverheels may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lone Ranger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mohawk, Native American and Zuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vitagraph Studios

added links pointing to Alan Hale, Rex Ingram, Earl Williams and Billy Anderson

Albert E. Smith (producer)

added a link pointing to San Juan Hill

Mabel Normand

added a link pointing to Albert E. Smith

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Time River. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stella Marks has been accepted

Stella Marks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stella Marks, self-portrait, ca. 1940.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stella Marks, self-portrait, ca. 1940.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at WP:MCQ#Photo was pulled from Stella Marks article, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help Ww2censor. I sent the permission letter to permission-en@wikipedia.org as I thought I was :instructed to do. As you said, they are backlogged so I guess it will take a long time. This whole process is so :confusing, including the instructions on how to do things. Thanks again for your help. Time River (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you did receive a ticket #, I think you can request information at Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard. You might also find it useful to read my image copyright information page that covers many of the issue you may encounter when dealing with images. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Time River. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Time River. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claudia Lennear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ash Grove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irene Bedard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catawba. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision of Irene Bedard article of Feb. 2

Hi Time River, In January, I edited the Irene Bedard article to correct the misinformation that she was the physical model for Disney's 'Pocahontas.' Glen Keane, the supervising animation editor of the film has stated on many occasions that the Pocahontas character was based on a combination of people, including two Mattaponi sisters (the Custalows), model Christy Turlington, model Naomi Campbell, and a university student, Dyna Taylor. Disney has never credited Irene Bedard with being the physical model for Pocahontas. Beard has claimed that her gestures were imitated in the film, but there is no proof of that (Bedard is not the only person in the world who has put her hair behind her ear, an example that Bedard mentioned in an interview). Can you please provide evidence for Bedard being the physical model for Pocahontas? I realize this is not a terribly important issue, but Wikipedia works best if we only include accurate information that can be sourced. Thank you. - Texasstorm Texasstorm (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re. the difference between "physical model" and "live action reference"

Hi Time River. Thank you for your explanation of your change to the Irene Bedard article. That's interesting that you are friends with her, and I'm sorry if my message to you re. sourcing was rude. I think part of the issue here is the difference between "physical model" and "live action reference." Disney (specifically Glen Keane) has said that numerous people were the physical model for their version of Pocahontas, and Irene Bedard is not among them. They had the concept art for Pocahontas long before Bedard was hired. (The first step in making a film is not to hire the voice actress.) Actually, before Bedard was hired, the singer, Judy Kuhn, was set to be the voice actress, but probably to demonstrate diversity, they hired Bedard to do the speaking voice. During production, they would have filmed Bedard doing some speaking to coordinate mouth movements. Bedard has said that this was so, and she also said that some of her gestures made it into the film. That latter point may or may not be true, but Disney actually credits Charmaine Craig and Natalie Belcon for live action reference. This would mainly refer to the model moving, running, turning her head, etc. to make the animation realistic. I realize that Bedard is often associated with being the physical model of Pocahontas, and fan fiction has often stated that, but as far as I can tell, it's mostly wishful thinking. I'm a fan of Bedard, too, particularly in Smoke Signals. I hope we're cool on this issue. Cheers. Texasstorm (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texasstorm (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Texasstorm, No, I didn't find it rude at all. I am totally with you on the concept that Wikipedia writers have a duty and obligation to be correct, document information with primary sources, and not be built on hearsay, which basically is what I did, based on what I remember Irene telling me when we were sitting in her and Deni's vendor tent at Southern California pow wows. I trust my memory, but recognize my lack of corroboration. I am having the opposite problem on another Wikipedia page I recently updated about an early Hollywood celebrity. I have date of birth corroboration from the 1900 and 1910 US census cards confirming the birth year, and from a US passport confirming the day of birth. I have put those in the Wiki article twice, only to have one or possibly two people revert the article to a different day and year. One of them is the grand nephew of the celebrity. The only source more prime than US Census cards would be the birth certificate, that I have found probably is not in public records, because of its age in 1893.

Back to our problem. The topic of who was the model for the cartoon character is probably most appropriate on the Wiki page for Pocahantas and Pocahantes 2, not on Irene Bedard's page. I am glad you are a fan of Irene's. She is a great actress, and a great person. Her recent troubles with the law are so counter to the person I worked with on two different productions and knew casually at events outside of work. I am really worried that the gossip press will crucify her and ruin her career. I have seen her do many philanthropic activities to help other people. She does not deserve this.Time River (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]