User talk:Tibullus/Archive 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Nova identidade.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nova identidade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Final Fronts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final Fronts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

A template on my watchlist that had had an accurate designation on it for a long time was changed, with no discussion or meaningful edit note, to a version that was less accurate. I returned it to the status quo, with an edit note explaining my reasons. Rather than open discussion at that point, you started editwar activity by reverting to your change, ignoring the shortcoming in it that I had pointed out, and leaving a sarcastic edit note. Do you believe that the phrase "North America" adequately defines and describes the membership of CONCACAF? If not (and I can only hope that you agree that it does not), and you have become aware that some other templates erroneously summarise it in those terms, then it is in your power to correct those other templates, not to render this one incorrect for the sake of some objective of "matching", nor to assume that I can divine to which templates you are referring. Kevin McE (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Country data African Union

Hi Tibullus,
I'm afraid I had to delete {{Country data African Union}}: The image it used, File:Flag of the African Union 2010.svg, is non-free and may not be used indiscriminately by that flag template. It's a rather stupid situation since many other union flags are free enough for such use. The African Union is not alone in this though, we have the same problem with for example ASEAN. If interested, the deletion discussion of the previous version of the flag is at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Logo of the African Union.svg.
Regards, Amalthea 18:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyball players

I have seen that you edited some volleyball articles. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 22:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked: Egregious incivility

This was absolutely outrageous, and I will revdelete the summary. You've been blocked for 31 hours. If you ever repeat such foul behaviour towards anybody, you will be blocked for a much longer period. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFPP

Hey there. Just a heads up that when you are adding a request at WP:RFPP, please add it to the top. The bottom is for requests that have already been gone over, and as such, your request could have gone unnoticed. I moved it to the top for ya though. :) Jmlk 1 7 19:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Florbela.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Florbela.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taça de Portugal

Olá aos utilizadores Secretaria e Tibullus.

Gostaria de pedir ajuda no que diz respeito à manutenção da página da Taça de Portugal, que é constantemente vandalizada por alguns anónimos que teimam em alterar os conteúdos com base no argumento de que o Campeonato de Portugal não conta para as estatísticas desta. Como é sabido, a competição que premiava o vencedor com a "Táça de Portugal" continuou a ser disputada nos mesmos moldes do Campeonato de Portugal e todos os vencedores desde 1922 até hoje estão inscritos no troféu exposto na sede da Federação Portuguesa de Futebol. Por exemplo, o vencedor da prova em 1924, o Olhanense, tem exactamente uma inscrição idêntica à do vencedor de 1961, o Leixões, ou à do Beira-Mar em 1999.

Foi questão de debate se no período de 1934-1938 o campeão nacional de futebol em Portugal era o vencedor da I Liga ou do Campeonato de Portugal (a própria imprensa debatia o assunto à época), por isso em 1938, a nomenclatura das provas foi alterada e ficou oficialmente acordado que o único campeão nacional seria o que vencesse a I Liga (renomeada para Campeonato Nacional da 1ª Divisão). Contudo historicamente os troféus nunca foram alterados e, por uma questão de coerência, não faz sentido estar a discriminar o que conta ou não baseado em empiricismos. A competição manteve-se disputada nos mesmos moldes e o troféu manteve-se sempre inalterado.

Se há contas quanto à legitimidade de quem, a dado ano, era o verdadeiro campeão nacional, essa é outra contabilidade, pois a dúvida poderia estender-se até finais dos anos 40, quando as equipas eram apuradas para o 1º escalão por convite baseado nas classificações distritais de apenas algumas associações, sendo o sistema de promoção/relegação nacional só implementado em 1947 com o fim dos campeonatos distritais. Poderíamos então até argumentar que até 1947 a única prova de cariz verdadeiramente nacional seria à Taça de Portugal, mas olhe-se porque perspectiva se olhar, o Benfica tem 27 réplicas da "Táça de Portugal", Sporting e Porto têm 19 cada um, o Belenenses detém 6 troféus exactamente idênticos e assim sucessivamente.

Agradeço desde já a sua ajuda na manutenção do artigo/página em questão --RnLdMrT (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óscar Vasques de Carvalho

The article Óscar Vasques de Carvalho has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Derild 49 21 ☼ 19:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal national rugby union team

I was wondering where you gained to information for the caps of the Portugal team? I have found that some of the information on certain websites to be inaccurate as they ignore test matches against low tier teams. --MSR-Liverpool (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Portugal national football team unofficial games results for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Portugal national football team unofficial games results, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portugal national football team unofficial games results until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 06:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tibullus/Portugal national football team unofficial games results

Userfied page is above Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

uefa finals

Nice work with them. I'll have a look and see if i can add some infos. -Koppapa (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SLB Fans

Hi there, please see a discussion post I have made at Talk:SLB Fans Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 15:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]