User talk:Tib42
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tib42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Your editing of this article is becoming disruptive. The article was already locked once because of battles, and the admin advised editors to discuss the issues on the article Talk page, not to resume edit-warring. There is a discussion on the Talk page, but you have stopped participating (you last posted there on June 15). Also, labeling other editors' edits as vandalism is not appropriate unless it is vandalism. Vandalism is not something you simply disagree with.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Please note that vandalism is a very specifically defined term at Wikipedia, and calling other person's good faith edits "vandalism" in edit summaries is both incivil and disruptive. This pertains to the edit warring you are participating at N. R. Narayana Murthy. If you continue to edit war, or refer to other good faith edits as vandalism, you will be blocked from editing. You need to take your concerns to the talk page of the article and stop simple blind reverting others. Please read WP:BRD to get a better understanding of how we deal with content disputes. It would likely be wise to consider this a final warning, and I don't want to revisit this issue again once the Full Protection expires on the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 15:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]I have protected the article N. R. Narayana Murthy again, and I am attempting to mediate a resolution on the talk page of the article. Since you have been involved in editing this article, I ask you to join the discussion so that a consensus can form. I'm sending this notice to all recent editors. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
I've reviewed your list. Many were already in the group that had consensus. The others I went and searched for sources but found none. Of course, this doesn't mean they don't exist, it just means they weren't quickly found. For an award to be considered, you will need to provide at least one independent source showing the award is notable. A source just talking about how it was given isn't sufficient, it needs to be an article or book section that talks about the actual award itself. The kind of source that would be used to show notability for the award to have its own article. Of course, to put one in the article, you also need a source showing it was given to him as well, which should be non-primary and also pass WP:RS. Local newspaper, trademag or anything that isn't primary or a press release should be fine for that. If you can add those each entry in the list and the sources hold up to WP:RS (both types of sourced required) then I wouldn't see a problem including the ones that did. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Narayana Murthy
[edit]Hi Tib! Dennis Brown approached me about closing the discussion at Talk:N. R. Narayana Murthy and I noticed that you requested a few days to find some information about the other rewards. Are you still in the process of looking for the information or should I close the discussion? Absent any new information by the 15th, I will be closing it based on what has been presented to date. I'd have no problem with discussion being re-opened in the future if you presented new information. Ryan Vesey Review me! 20:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Allow me to be blunt: A formal discussion was initiated on the talk page, allowing everyone to participate in an equal and even way. I mediated this. This whole process began because of your edit warring, providing a neutral venue to discuss the merits. After a period of time, after no one else had any more input, a neutral editor closed the discussion. You declined to provide a rational for the wholesale inclusion of the the very awards you reinserted afterwards. This is clearly an attempt to start a process, ignore it once consensus isn't going your way, then insert the very same material again against a clear consensus. This is the de facto definition of disruptive editing. If you continue in this fashion, you will be blocked. This should be considered a last and final warning. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at N. R. Narayana Murthy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You should be discussing your continuous changes to the infobox rather than stubbornly reinserting them. Edit-warring is not the answer to a content dispute. --♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Rubbish. I have discussed this on the talk page for the past four months and you have not bothered to respond. I have clearly stated the reasons for my suggested edits and without stating your precise reasons you have reversed these edits. You are objecting to simple things like TIME magazine's recognition but you don't hold the stame standard to Mark Zuckerberg or even to Dhirubhai Ambani or Lakshmi Mittal. Clearly you work for some sort of a rival group/company and you have some personal agenda going on here. - Tib42
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 19:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ryan Vesey 19:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
AN notification
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)