User talk:Thomaszzza

February 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Thomas—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wildcat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Simone, you may be blocked from editing. Renewal6 (talk) 00:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sting. Renewal6 (talk) 00:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 00:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)