User talk:ThomasJCyrus

Image tagging for Image:Fansonly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fansonly.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved to User:ThomasJCyrus/Itinerary

Hi. I've just moved the article you created at Thomas J Cyrus Itinerary to User:ThomasJCyrus/Itinerary, because pages for organising your tasks on Wikipedia belong in the user space, not the main article space. I suspect you probably created it in the article space by accident - I've done that myself in the past too! Still, no harm done. I recommend you put a link to that subpage on your user page too so you can get to it easily. See WP:USER for more details on user subpages, or leave a message on my talk page if you require any further assistance. Thanks. ~Matticus ^T_C 14:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mac's Tavern has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 03:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dangler

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Dangler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Speedmarket Avenue

A tag has been placed on Speedmarket Avenue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Frehley ^Space ^Ace 11:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello ThomasJCyrus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 244 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sarah Martin (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Legion in popular culture

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legion in popular culture. Robofish (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Year Supply of Fairy Cakes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Year Supply of Fairy Cakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year Supply of Fairy Cakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Do the needful for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Do the needful is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do the needful until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smtchahal (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Year Supply of Fairy Cakes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Year Supply of Fairy Cakes. Since you had some involvement with the Year Supply of Fairy Cakes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]