User talk:Thing User

January 2021

Deleted warnings. --Serols (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was not trying to be unconstructive and I thought it was ok because it was in the nonsense/vandalism section Thing User (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thing User, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thing User! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Deleted warning. --Serols (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its not vandalism. It was a pool that is not meant to be encyclopedic content Thing User (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Thing User. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Not vandalism

You're right, it's not vandalism. Hopefully the reverting will stop. You have to admit, it kind of looks like vandalism to those unfamiliar with the page in question. I can understand the mistake.

Anyway, welcome. A gentle reminder: this is primarily an encyclopedia, so you're eventually going to get more legitimate pushback if all you do is spend time on WP:FUN pages. But this was a rougher than necessary introduction. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware what the page is about but this [1] looks like vandalism whilst this [2] looks fine. 17:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I guess my point is that AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...etc is just as reasonable a guess as the other entries in the nonsense/vandalism category. It just looks more like vandalism to an anti-vandalism patroller. I believe it's an uncyclopedia meme. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting this out. Thing User (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thing User, sorry for my warnings, but your edits looks like vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine Serols I see how it could be seen as vandalism Thing User (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]