Jump to content

User talk:Theleekycauldron/Archive/2024/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in August! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for helping with the Rihm question-mark! - My story today is about a woman, nominated for RD but needing support as I write this. A composer died whose article is long and mostly unreferenced. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Internet Archive

Is there a tool that will automatically add Internet Archive links and formatting to articles? I'm trying to figure it out for Hope Emerson. SL93 (talk) 00:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@SL93 Have you tried this? BorgQueen (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes. It says, "Permission error The action you are trying to perform requires the analyzepage permission. This permission is obtainable with the following groups: basicuser, user, admin, root, bot" SL93 (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
@SL93: sounds like an OAuth problem – see if signing out of the tool and signing in again works? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
That worked. Thank you. SL93 (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Theleekycauldron/Drafts/List of The West Wing characters

It seems User:Theleekycauldron/Drafts/List of The West Wing characters satisfies WP:COPIES. Would you mind {{db-u1}}ing it, so we can save ourselves an MfD? Regards Paradoctor (talk) 10:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

@Paradoctor: I'd rather keep the page, so I'll just delete the copied text as I don't need it anyway, and tag the page. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Love that you refuse to give this up. A big year for TWW personalities too... BusterD (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
@BusterD: in truth, the new book has made me a little sad. I don't know why, but I've always felt a little sorry for performers who get distilled down to one note/trick/act by the public – 18 years after The West Wing finished its run, even the legendary Martin Sheen hasn't been able to escape its shadow. I guess there's only so many times you can outdo yourself, be a part of a more successful, more notable project. And then you can either embrace it and give the public what they want over and over again (Joshua Malina), leave it behind and try and become a thing of the past (Rupert Grint), or go off and do a bunch of weird stuff to try and distance yourself from it and sacrifice your clout in the process (Daniel Radcliffe). None of which sound particularly enticing. (Although, funnily enough since i mention two Harry Potter-famous actors, I think Emma Watson has done about as well as anyone could do at staying relevant and cutting ties to a past superstar role.) I'd really, really hate to be a one-superhit wonder. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 09:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Of course, no problem. Paradoctor (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK query

Hi there, I know you're active at DYK, so figured I'd run this by you. I began a discussion there a few weeks back, see Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 200#Potential Issues with DYK Image Process, but received no comments. I'm not sure how pertinent this issue is—does it seem worth reviving the discussion or just letting it go? Aza24 (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, Aza24! I think the reason that thread slipped under the radar is because it's not a common error for DYK to make – the amount of time it would take to conclusively verify that an image is of a person versus the percentage chance that that check turns up something actionable would probably be a pretty poor tradeoff. So I wouldn't bet on DYK being willing to do much about the past couple of instances – but it's nice to have people who are alert to it :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

September music

story · music · places

Thank you for good advice! I would next time use the term "review" but keep hoping no next time of a woman being overlooked will happen. - Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

About GalliumBot's talk page updates

Hey leeky, I noticed that for this DYK nomination, GalliumBot did not update the talk page when the hook was adjusted in the prep area with this edit. Might be something to take a look at! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, TechnoSquirrel69! GalliumBot is currently not running the darn protocol; it's down for maintenance indefinitely. Sorry, but I'm pretty touch-and-go with actually making my scripts work, so I have no idea when it'll be back up. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
No worries, I appreciate the update! May the duck bring you good fortune. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

2003:EE:9F19:AD00:D630:5342:7A70:5621 , 87.171.174.211 and 2003:EE:9F19:AD00:E338:4AA8:E17B:CC84

Hi Thellekycauldron, pls help to block sock /meat sock IP addresses above which they are "mass" vandalising German political articles where they were blocked 4 times today by Oshwah already. Thank you Cassiopeia talk 06:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Notice when promoting hooks

When I open the PSHAW page, every time, it gives me a pop-up that it looks like I edited the nom page, even if I never edited that and/or the article. I think the notice should only appear if the promoter has made at least one edit to the relevant pages. JuniperChill (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

@JuniperChill: thanks for the note! should be fixed now? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Great, thank you for the fix leek! I also note that I was the third user, and first non-nom who commented/supported the RfA. It was even more so when two of my favourite users was nominating (you can see that I had a chat with both users before). I even managed to write more than a sentence to become one of the first! Good thing I refreshed my watchlist. JuniperChill (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
@JuniperChill: ooh, quick on the draw! I've seen RfAs (own included?) where people are edit conflicting each other in the support section, it's always fun for candidates when that happens :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 11:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I was lucky considering that the next comment was simply a signature and that it happened 1 min later. I think I had an edit conflict when voting on an RfA before, but I never did on this one. JuniperChill (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Generic middle-east topics template

I really don't know why you left a generic middle-east topics template on my talk page, when I've been editing middle-east related Wikipedia articles off and on for upwards of 15 years. Furthermore, Jewish Palestinian Aramaic is NOT an article related to the Arab-Israeli conflict (as your use of the template falsely claims) -- that language died out about a thousand years ago, and the use of "Palestinian" as a scholarly term there has nothing to do with modern politics. The real problem is that the article has a tendency to attract the attention of cranks. I really don't need your advice in dealing with linguistic cranks on the topic of ancient Aramaic languages, but thanks anyway... AnonMoos (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: Thanks for stopping by my talk page! Sorry for the response delay, I've been busy. First: my bad on the intro to contentious topics alert. Second: "the article has a tendency to attract the attention of cranks" is really not a great justification for the comment that earned you a warning. Please be civil to other users in your interactions, even when you disagree with them, otherwise you might be blocked from editing. theleekycauldron (talk o she/her) 09:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Your so-called "warning"[sic] is based on a factually-false mistaken template which does not apply to the situation at all, so in fact I have NOT been warned as far as templates go. I often remove hectoring nonsense from my user talk page, but I feel no need to do so now, since what's there says a lot more about you than it does about me. AnonMoos (talk) 08:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
@AnonMoos: Ah, I see the source of the confusion. The warning is not based on the template. The two are unrelated; the warning, which is contained in the text under the template, is based on what you said to Kingoflevant. Civility policy does apply outside of contentious topic areas. Although if you feel you haven't been sufficiently warned, I'm happy to try and explain it again. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

Thriley has given you a pack of Toblerone bars! Chocolate promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Toblerone bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a pack of Toblerone bars, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Fantastic work on Celebrity Number Six!

Spread the goodness of Toblerone bars by adding {{subst:Toblerone for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Thriley (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I love Toblerone – thanks, Thriley! haven't thought about in ages, but it's so good. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fedorenko v. United States

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fedorenko v. United States you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverLocust -- SilverLocust (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

trout Self-trout for that typo, and for the edit actually resetting the RfC not going through. Not quite bad enough for the stocks, which is its own kind of embarrassing... theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

PSHAW

Hi. Hope you are well. I was trying to withdraw my own DYK nomination when I realized I can't seem to find PSHAW in my toolbox. Has something changed or is the workbench unhappy? Cielquiparle (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, @Cielquiparle! I'm not sure why it's not showing up, but you could always try installing User:Theleekycauldron/Scripts/PSHAW/main.js instead, it's the updated version :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 09:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theleekycauldron/Archive/2024/September&oldid=1249865138"