User talk:Thedorigi

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Divock Origi. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Kareldorado (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Divock Origi's "false start"

Hi Thedorigi, I invite you to take a look at the talk page of Divock Origi. The match against Luxembourg was meant as official international, I know, but because of one Belgian substitution too much (7 instead of 6) this match is no longer considered as official by FIFA. For the same reason, Romelu Lukaku saw his hat-trick wiped away. Are you willing to undo your latest edits at Divock Origi? Thanks, Kareldorado (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stats in football players' infoboxes

Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 17:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi matty, I thought I was doing this? Thedorigi (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)thedorigi[reply]

Hello

Hello my friend, hope you are well regards Zafiraman Lets talk about it 22:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Maxime Gonalons page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mats Hummels without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! QED237 (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Mats Hummels, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. QED237 (talk) 19:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Charli XCX, you may be blocked from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yann M'Vila with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ... discospinster _talk 23:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion involving you at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism regarding your recent edits Zafiraman Lets discuss it 15:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox updating

Hello. The point is, you hadn't seen him play a full match for Derby. If you had, there wouldn't have been a problem with it being updated. At the time you updated, Mr Ibe was still on the pitch with a good 25–30 minutes left to play. Another time, please wait until the end of the game, or at least until the player has been subbed off, and then set the timestamp properly. It's supposed to reflect a time at which the stats are unambiguously correct, so needs to be set to a time after the last match included in the stats; 17:48 was two hours before the match you were counting kicked off. The easy way is, if you set it to five tilde characters ~~~~~, the system will translate that into the current date and time. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the five tildes ~~~~~ when updating so we get a correct timestamp AFTER match was finished. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, it must be a time AFTER the match not 10am. QED237 (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL NOTE. A timestamp AFTER the matches has been played. The match on 3 February ended around 21:00 GMT and not 10:08 like in your edit. You have been told how to update. QED237 (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Will Hughes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Table dates

Hi, could you please remember to update the dates above career stats tables? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Thiago Motta. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. QED237 (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mario Lemina. Dl2000 (talk) 03:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Serge Gakpé. QED237 (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamps

Hi, when will you learn to use the 5 tildes? See above. QED237 (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Adil Rami, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. See above, Timestamp not even touched. UPDATE TIMESTAMPS QED237 (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this editor actively vandalising wikipedia or just neglecting to update timestamps? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Luca Toni, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Patrick Herrmann, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Łukasz Piszczek. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Failed to update infobox timestamp again QED237 (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: Hi, I am not here to question you and you probably know better than me. I just feel like the editor wants to help but dont know how (lack of communication I dont know why) so it is hard to say "not here to build encyclopedia. An indefinate block could to me seem to hard, a long regular block could be enough, but I also understand and respect your position. QED237 (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: Indefinite is not a long block - it's of unknown length. User has already "sat out" one block and no evidence of asking for help. Indef forces discussion if they want to continue. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: Thank you for the explanation. I did not look at it that way. QED237 (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm blocked indefinitely, does that mean I can't talk on people's talk page? I feel this seems a bit harsh as I'm only here to update footballers profiles accordingly. Also I've noticed someone has added 3 goals to divock origis wiki page. he only has 3 goals in league. QED, if you'd be kind enough to revert that change. Thedorigi (talk) 18:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)thedorigi[reply]

As explained "indefinately" is not forever so If I were you I would try understand why you were blocked and learn how to edit correctly. Then you can make unblock request and if unblock is granted you can edit yourself. Do you know why you have been blocked (a tip: read your talkpage)? QED237 (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been any updates as to when I will be unblocked from editing? 16:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Thedorigi (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to put through a request to be unblocked, as described in the blocking template above.--5 albert square (talk) 23:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedorigi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin users, I believe i should be unblocked from editing on wikipedia as i contribute to the profiles of football players and managers statistics up to date. In future i will remember to use the 4 tildes when needed and update the 'pcupdate' or 'ntupdate' everytime. If you were to review all my edits you'd find that it backs up what i'm saying. I'm still quite new to the whole process so i'm not even sure i've done this unblock appeal correctly. Once again i must stress that i would never vandalize any wiki pages, it's not in my intention. Thedorigi (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I realize that you were only warned about 30 times for making unsourced changes, but I agree with Ronhjones that too much time has been wasted cleaning up your edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedorigi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason why i was blocked and accept this. I apologize and i guarentee i will not do this again. i reiterate my desire to just help contribute here in wikipedia with updates. Thedorigi (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is a competence is required issue here. You have been told how to edit correctly, but have been unable to do so. PhilKnight (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2015

Since iam unable to edit, could i request that someone please complete the edits of the professional boxing record of the likes of joshua clottey, spike o'sullivan and omar figueroa as i've noticed they're not fully input? Thedorigi (talk) 12:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating spike o sullivan's record, however still noticed joshua clottey's and omar figeroa's yet to be done.. Also could someone update Thomas Oosthizen's last fight yesterday. he beat robert berridge by UD

{{unblock}}

I would like to offer you some advice on how to make it more likely that your unblock request will be unblocked. As can be seen here, two months ago you wrote "for no good reason my edits ALWAYS get reverted" and "i don't understand why my changes get reverted". Now, you say "i understand how my edits on wikipedia can been perceived as unnecessary". If you now do understand what you didn't understand before, then that is obviously good, and it is reasonable to consider unblocking you. However, the problem is that quite often editors who are blocked say "I understand what was wrong with my editing" in the hope that saying so will get them unblocked, when in fact they don't understand. For that reason, administrators tend to be reluctant to unblock just because a blocked editor says that they understand. The best thing for you to do now is to explain here what you think were the problems with your editing. If you do that, an administrator can actually see whether you really do understand or not. Also, "i understand how my edits on wikipedia can been perceived as unnecessary" could give the impression that you don't think there really was a problem, and it was all a misunderstanding by other editors. You are unlikely to be unblocked as long as that impression is there. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedorigi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

following my latest unblock appeal i'd like to thank jamesBwatson for the advice you left on my talkpage. i do realise there was a few problems with my editing, firstly i didn't update the 'pc update' or 'nt update' on certain footballers profile pages...i also removed/erased few bits of details which at the time I felt didn't belong on the profile page, i then went on to revert the change made by the admin who reverted my change as i was adamant that this information was not needed on the page. Of course all blocked users will at 1 point use the term i understand where my mistakes lied and will not reepeat this. as it's the only real thing they can think of to be unblocked. but i also know all edits or changes made by a certain ip address are all monitored and recorded in the history section.

Decline reason:

Describe how do you update the 'pc update' field. PhilKnight (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedorigi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@ PhilKnight - you can update a pc field straight after a game has finished, depending on which player you're updating that player's pc may have not been updated in 2 weeks, 3 weeks, months etc so you have to add up the appearances and goals from the last time it was updated which shows as the last date. i would be an editer who would update immediately after a match has ended. Thedorigi (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no deadline and being "first" to report a news or sports story is not really what Wikipedia is about. Sorry, I don't think you've really convinced me you truly understand why you were blocked in the first place. I don't think we're getting anywhere with this, so I'm turning your talk page access off, which means you need to contact the Unblock ticket request system to get unblocked. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.