User talk:Theatrebuff1989

This is Theatrebuff1989's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dafydd Rogers (Theatre Producer) (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at David Pugh (theatre producer). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dafydd Rogers (Theatre Producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! not sure if I've replied to the right place below so am replying here as well. Thanks for the note and the reply above. I am a bit confused. The reason I created this page in the first place was because I noticed that someone had deleted all of Dafydd Rogers contributions to the Pugh and Rogers partnership and changed the Pugh and Rogers joint page to just Pugh (see David Pugh Theatre Producer page history). Now I'm being told to remerge the two pages - so does this mean that the other page doesn't qualify for a page on its own either? I'm concerned about the integrity of the Pugh page ( I added Rogers name back in to that page and mention of their partnership). Given there is some messing around on the Pugh page taking place I thought it was better and cleaner for facts to just create a new separate bio page for Rogers - especially since the Pugh page had been accepted by community (it seems). This was a notable theatre partnership that ended in 2019 and both producers are continuing to work independently. Please advise! thanks so much! Theatrebuff1989 Theatrebuff1989 (talk) 08:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI Dan Arndt: I'm new to wikipedia and am not sure I fully understand everything but I reverted the redirect you made from my resubmitted draft as it redirects the proposed Dafydd Rogers page to David Pugh's page. The whole point is that I am proposing that there are two separate pages and Rogers should not redirect to Pugh. Yes there are some overlaps in shared content but there are also differences since 2020 and before 1996. I hope I haven't broken any important links in reverting this so wanted to reach out to check in with you. Theatrebuff1989. Theatrebuff1989 (talk) 11:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theatrebuff1989! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the note and the reply above. I am a bit confused. The reason I created this page in the first place was because I noticed that someone had deleted all of Dafydd Rogers contributions to the Pugh and Rogers partnership and changed the Pugh and Rogers joint page to just Pugh (see David Pugh Theatre Producer page history). Now I'm being told to remerge the two pages - so does this mean that the other page doesn't qualify for a page on its own either? also I the editor of the Pugh page was clearly messing around with the factual record and I'm concerned about the integrity of the Pugh page ( I added Rogers name back in to that page and mention of their partnership). Given there is some messing around on the Pugh page taking place I thought it was better and cleaner for facts to just create a new separate bio page for Rogers - especially since the Pugh page had been accepted by community (it seems). This was a notable theatre partnership that ended in 2019 and both producers are continuing to work independently so I suppose that they will warrant their own pages at some point? Please advise! thanks so much! Theatrebuff1989 (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dafydd Rogers has been accepted

Dafydd Rogers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]