User talk:The one who creates pages

The one who creates pages, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The one who creates pages! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, The one who creates pages, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of ice hockey players considered the greatest of all time

Hello, The one who creates pages,

Thanks for creating List of ice hockey players considered the greatest of all time! I edit here too, under the username Britishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

You can have a list article of the greatest Ice Hockey players by a single expert high quality source (or series of tables from different expert sources); however when you mix expert sources, into one table, you are getting close to WP:OR. If you are not going to use seperate tables for each expert source, then at minimum, I would put a section at the start specifically listing the expert sources you are going to use, so that readers know that inclusion on the table is not your opinion but due to being on this specific list. Even then, choice of what that list of experts is could also be OR. Either way, this article is a candidate for AfD because of OR issues. Hope this helps you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ice hockey players considered the greatest of all time for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ice hockey players considered the greatest of all time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ice hockey players considered the greatest of all time until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Greatest sportspeople

Template:Greatest sportspeople has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ZZ

We only add honours when persons are head coaches, not assistants. Same for infobox as those would be getting full very quickly (Michael Henke e.g.). Kante4 (talk) 08:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Las Blancas listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Las Blancas. Since you had some involvement with the Las Blancas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Piemonte Calcio" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Piemonte Calcio has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 23 § Piemonte Calcio until a consensus is reached. 14 novembre (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]