User talk:The crazy edit

December 2020

Hello, I'm BlacknoseDace. I noticed that you recently removed content from Living Water Christian School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BlacknoseDace(say something. I'm lonely!)^{[I'm not a reference!]} 19:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rhode Island Red have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rhode Island Red was changed by The crazy edit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933513 on 2021-01-26T14:22:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:New Tomato Varieties

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:New Tomato Varieties, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Un assiolo (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Silkie have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Silkie was changed by The crazy edit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892794 on 2021-04-12T19:40:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

living waters christian school

If you continue to add your opinions and personal knowledge to Wikipedia articles, or make any further disruptive edits such as those at Living Water Christian School, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomato. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tomato was changed by The crazy edit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958831 on 2021-04-12T21:45:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Potato, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Potato was changed by The crazy edit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85286 on 2021-04-12T21:48:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained the requirement for reliable sourcing to you in great detail and yet you continue to add your own opinions and beliefs to articles. If this continues when the block expires I imagine you will be blocked for a much longer duration.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-edit4|Potato}}--Mr Fink (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued addition of unsourced content and original research to articles immediately following the expiry of your last block. I'm not entirely sure you are able to understand how sourcing and verfiability work on Wikipedia, so I've blocked you for an indefinite period. That is, you are blocked until you are able to make an appeal that convinces an administrator that you can and will comply with WP:RS and will contribute constructively.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: I also have noticed you have reverted the sports section of the page without sourcing your content, I know this is just a mistake but you still have time to fix it.