User talk:The Summum Bonum

This is The Summum Bonum's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Summum Bonum (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garsh2 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Summum bonum instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please consider contributing to the existing article on this topic instead of creating a new one as duplicates cannot be accepted. Thank you!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Summum Bonum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garsh (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Summum Bonum! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Garsh (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate and my apologies it was a sandbox article and I wasn’t aware where it went there was a option to submit for approval and here you are informing me of the discrepancy Thank you so muuch. The Summum Bonum (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk page comments

Wikipedia talk pages are meant to be a correct record of the conversation as it happened. Do not edit your comments after they have been replied to, it destroys the context of the replying comments. MrOllie (talk) 12:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say I can't edit my comment? every Edit is recorded so what does the context got to do with it? The Summum Bonum (talk) 13:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TPG. MrOllie (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't on talk page I was on a Invitation page it was under Proposal pages please specify The Summum Bonum (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you were on a public talk page. What you did was the equivalent of walking up to a handbill someone posted on the street and declining the invitation - which was made to everyone. MrOllie (talk) 13:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Project Page Wikipedia:Village Pump(proposals) please reviews where my comment was. there is a talk page and a Project Page, the conversation was on Project Page. The Summum Bonum (talk) 13:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a noticeboard, and follows all the rules for talk pages, since it is a place discussion among editors takes place. MrOllie (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]