User talk:The Squicks

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of November 2009.

Archives

Archive 1 (Feb. 08 - May 09), Archive 2 (May 09 - Sept. 09), Archive 3 (Sept. 09), Archive 4 (Oct. 09 - Nov. 09)

Dude, please come back. You are one of the voices of sanity here. 173.7.76.110 (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fare thee well. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, you've left a Squicks-shaped hole in the 'pedia. Maybe you'll un-retire sometime? Best wishes, hamiltonstone (talk) 05:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly are you "retired" since you're still editing? Nothing to see here folks, just keep moving? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.251.49 (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry to see the situation drive you away like that. I hope you reconsider, and echo CoM's sentiment above. Good luck to you in whatever endeavors you undertake! Shereth 16:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Denialism

An article that you have been involved in editing, Denialism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denialism (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unomi (talk) 06:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But but..The ga-nom!

Now it's in limbo! :( Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anti-Christian sentiment in the United Kingdom

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Anti-Christian sentiment in the United Kingdom. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Christian sentiment in the United Kingdom. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Teabagger

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Teabagger. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teabagger. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obama Derangement Syndrome listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Obama Derangement Syndrome. Since you had some involvement with the Obama Derangement Syndrome redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Acting white

Acting white has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Geert Wilders

Geert Wilders has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Dajasj (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]