User talk:The Rebellious Blood

March 2023

Hello, I'm ThethPunjabi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sidhu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please do not remove sourced content from the article without building consensus (WP:CON) first, thank you. ThethPunjabi (talk) 10:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThethPunjabi dear, the story of bhatti rajput origin was created. in the oldest records the Phulkains are always Jat The Rebellious Blood (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rebellious Blood You need to reference reliable sources for your desired additions and establish consensus before removing any cited sections of the article. Please review WP:RS. ThethPunjabi (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThethPunjabi https://books.google.com/books/about/Calcutta_Review.html?id=l5kbAQAAIAAJ. see the page no. 245 of the calcutta review book The Rebellious Blood (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rebellious Blood Unfortunately, British Raj-era ethnographic sources are not allowed to be cited on Wikipedia, as per WP:RAJ. Please use sources that meet the requirements of WP:RS (pay close attention to WP:OLDSOURCES). ThethPunjabi (talk) 14:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Dhamiak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Dhamiak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs page numbers for book citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk why not suitable ? I can give more sources The Rebellious Blood (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The issues I'm running in to is that there are no page numbers on the sources, which makes it nearly impossible to verify the content. Can you add page numbers to the references, so that they can be verified? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk dont u know khokhar jats killed ghori ?? read something brother The Rebellious Blood (talk) 03:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, I was able to verify that by reading the source. But, the article appears to be about a battle., and I couldn't verify the battle's existence by reading the source. If you have page numbers, they would really help with verifiability. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk notes on Balochistan and Afghanistan by hg raverty 1888 pp.667

go and read The Rebellious Blood (talk) 04:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bhim Singh Rana of Gohad

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Bhim Singh Rana of Gohad has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.jatland.com/home/Maharaja_Bhim_Singh_Rana and jatland.com is not compatibly licensed.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jatland.com is not compatibly licensed. — Diannaa (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Naseeb2468 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naseeb2468. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]