User talk:The Original Historygeek

Welcome!

Hello, The Original Historygeek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Will Beback talk 16:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesús T. Piñero

Hello Original Historygeek, how are you doing? I saw your edit in the Jesús T. Piñero article. Good call! But, since you are a history geek, I would like to inform you that Juan Bernardo Huyke was not the first native born interim governor. That distinction belongs to Juan Ponce de León II who in 1578 assumed the governorship of Puerto Rico until the arrival of Jerónimo De Agüero Campuzano. Saludos Tony the Marine (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Governor question

Hola mi amigo, I always enjoy interacting with others who are interested in history.

Now, in regard to your question: Do you know of any logical reason why Rafael Hernandez Colon would not be considered the 4th and 6th governor of Puerto Rico?

Logic tells us that we have had only nine individuals democratically elected governors of Puerto Rico. When a governor wins an election and later serves consecutive terms upon his/her relection their administration is counted as one, where upon there is an "unwritten law" somewhere that most likely states that if a running governor loses an election and is reelected on a rebound four years later, his administration will be counted as a new one and hence in Hernandez Colon's case, who served in two non-consecutive terms, he was both #4 and #6. Simlilar to Pres. Grover Cleveland. Logic? no. Practical? maybe.

I hope that you don't get too frustrated here with some people when it comes to discussing politics. A lot of people think that they know everything y no saben nada. They do not seem to get it into thier heads that Wikipedia is an educational project and not a political forum.

I enjoy writing about the positive contributions which Puerto Ricans and Hispanics have made to society and the world in general and about historical facts which have often been omitted from history books either by biased historians or because such facts have fallen into the "cracks" of history. It makes me feel good when my work has been recognized by goverments, etc. I even found out that "El Boricuazo" feed of my work for his book, not bad, right? Aqui estoy a tus ordenes. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Sanchez

I checked and saw that the non-registered user has been warned. If he vandalizes one more time, let me know and I'll block. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardozo

No problem; as for restoring, I just went to the history for the page, and went back to just before his-then-first edit in the sequence. You edit that old version, and save directly, thus restoring the page to what it was before the changes started. Magidin (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Sanchez

I agree that the complete DOB should not be listed- not because of someone's claim that they are a friend of hers and she would like it kept off, but because there is no readily, easily accessible article out there that links her to it. But the year of birth alone is clearly established and should go up.MStoke (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Sanchez's page for discussion DOB --Matteblack (talk) 23:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sanchez is composing a response for me to post shorlty. But I wonder if you've noticed that this Mstokes edits ONLY this one page? Isn't that curious? As I said, we can arrange to have you speak to her. If you give me an email, we can arrange it. (Is there a way to mail you through Wikipedia?) --Matteblack (talk) 22:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images in userspace

Even though you're using it to help with editing a mainspace article, there is a rule against using a non-free image in userspace wihout "disabling" it the way the bot did earlier today. Unless there is an exception of some sort for actively edited sandboxes, in which I apologize for the disruption. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 03:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After asking another editor for help all I can do is point you to Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria exemptions which I don't think will cover user sandboxes. Sorry. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 14:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Weird page

It is done, see: President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status, the problem was a weird one indeed. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rosario Marin

OriginalHistoryGeek: Re Rosario Marin's ethics violations being blamed on getting "bad legal advice from state attorneys." Lawyers represent their clients; the State hires lawyers to represent the State. State attorneys do not represent people in their individual capacities, nor do they provide advice regarding people's private business interests. Marin's "state attorneys" represented the state agency she worked for, they didn't represent Marin the businesswoman who made speeches through her private corporation. The fact that a state attorney's review of an official's conflict of interest filings does not mean the the attorney has "approved" the information contained in the filing has been confirmed by the Governor's Legal Affairs Secretary. Unfortunately, the CFPPC did not talk to the state attorneys about their role, otherwise, Marin would not have been able to get them to believe her incorrect version of events. The fact is, Marin chose to do speaking engagements through her private corporation and she has no one to blame for her ethics violations but herself. ElvisWasMyDaddy (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Answered over on the article's Talk page) The Original Historygeek (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed stories

(carried over from Talk:The Golden Age of Science Fiction (anthology))

Drag- been looking for my old HS sci fi anthology textbook. Thought this might be it, but some stories I remember aren't there. Ah well. The Original Historygeek (talk) 17:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you looking for? - Pointillist (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:RNHA

You are right. I protected the RNHA, from that bad apple's vandalism and opened up a discussion in the RNHA's talk page:[1]. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. At first glance, I thought that by protecting the page he/she would discuss his/her actions, but when I checked the User further, I realized that the account was solely created to vandalize the RNHA page and that the User had violated the 3-revert rule. Therefore, since you had already posted an invitation to talk about the issues in the User's talk page and the User did not respond, I blocked the User from editing for a period of 1 week. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanic and Latino American Politics

I am a new Wikipedian and just added to the page Hispanic and Latino American Politics. I would appreciate any comments, tips, and edits to make this page better. Thank you for your help! Thisonewins (talk) 03:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KatherineDOrtega.gif

Thank you for uploading File:KatherineDOrtega.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rosa Gumataotao Rios sig.jpg

The file File:Rosa Gumataotao Rios sig.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]