User talk:The Green Apron Club

Welcome!

Hello, The Green Apron Club, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Utah State Bar does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Utah State Bar edits

The nature of your edits makes it appear that you have some kind of axe to grind with this organization. Please note that one of Wikipedia's core policies is that articles are written from a neutral point of view and only draw information from reliable sources. If you want to make changes to the article that are controversial and could cause dispute, please discuss them on the article talk page. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Utah State Bar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mormon Tabernacle Choir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 06:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 05:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vox Chiasmus

A tag has been placed on Vox Chiasmus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Reads like an essay, possible copyvio, no sources

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eman 235/talk 06:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]