User talk:The Emperor's New Spy/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

Collapsed ahnentafeln, again

Please see Template talk:ahnentafel top, for which User:Thumperward has now created a (non-default) "hide" option ["collapsed=yes"]. He wants to delete my makeshift Template:ahnentafel-collapsed-top, but I asked him to wait until we can make the necessary substitutions [—now done] —— Shakescene (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I think you should talk to User:CapitalR about changing back the template to its collapsed state it originally was at. There was no discussion about this change. It's a waste a space on many articles.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 22:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I think this administrator must just dislike collapsed templates in general, since his or her user page shows a tool to Expand Templates (see Special pages in your own Toolbox on the left sidebar). I don't think she or he had any idea of the trouble this would cause (this template links to over 2,500 separate articles, some of which probably benefit from an open ahnentafel, e.g. Alexander the Great, while the ones we've worked on generally don't).
Unfortunately, there are only two contributions from CapitalR in July and none in August; I think (hoping of course that's it not something more serious) that this administrator is either taking a real-world or Wiki holiday, or away from his or her computer because of a technical breakdown, academic schedule or workplace situation. So reaching him or her might be slow or difficult.
¶ How does one best gather the open vs collapsed default preferences of the individual editors of a couple of thousand affected articles? You'd know best, since I've fiddled with only a dozen of them whereas you must be quite familiar with groups like Wikipedia:WikiProject British Royalty. This might require a Request for Comment on the Wikipedia-wide Centralized Discussion template, but the question would be where to anchor that discussion (e.g. the ahnentafel-top talk page or Wikipedia:WikiProject Royalty)?—— Shakescene (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say that I don't know how would you go around doing that. I haven't done that before. I not really familiar with those groups you said but I would post the issue on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Royalty, telling people to check the problem out on the ahnentafel-top talk page. Sorry if this didn't help very much. You might want to check the Help desk for more professional help. --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

See: Template talk:Ahnentafel top/Requested Comments 1. I haven't followed the precise procedure, but I posted notices at the Royalty and British Royalty Wikiprojects. —— Shakescene (talk) 08:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Please contribute your (Maundy) twopenceworth at Template talk:Ahnentafel top/Requested Comments 1 . Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 03:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Captions

I see you've been adding a lot of images lately. Can you please caption each one when you add it? Images must have captions, and you probably shouldn't add an image you can't caption anyway. Srnec (talk) 22:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Got it, no problem. Probably the only caption I can write are their names, for example Guy of Dampierre there is a picture of him on a horse and nothing else written; I can't write "Picture of Guy riding on a horse next to a priest."--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

See what I did at Guy's article for an example of how I would do it. (I had to click on the Flanders link to check the coat of arms thing.) Srnec (talk) 01:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay. I mostly just trust Wikipedia commons and other language wikipedia that bears that picture.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 01:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Moving

I'm glad I can help! You need to place {{movereq|Wilhelmine of Prussia}} at the talk page and this text below that template:

[[:Wilhelmine of Prussia, Queen of the Netherlands]] → [[Wilhelmine of Prussia]] — This article should be moved because [blahblahblah]. ~~~~

I'll check whether you did it correctly :) Surtsicna (talk) 11:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Piedmont

Hey, look here for Victor Amadeus I and here for heir apparent HRH the Prince of Piedmont (talk) 14:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Sidonie of Poděbrady

Hello, I've completed the article on Sidonie, sorry it's a little late I've been busy with other commitments, thank you--David (talk) 19:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Elizabeth Ramsay of Mar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Lennart Bernadotte

Would you be interested reviewing, filling out and/or correcting Grandchildren of Lennart Bernadotte and Lennart Bernadotte, or know someone who might be? Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry no. You can try asking someone on Wikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

An Online Gotha has moved

Hi, again, I see that you added the link to An Online Gotha to Lennart Bernadotte's page. The link wasn't completely dead, but the site's now moved to http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/sweden.html (for Sweden) and http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/gotha.htm for the home page. I've updated the link for Lennart Bernadotte, as well as for Folke Bernadotte (not inserted by you), but if you remember (or want to check your own contributions from the top right hand link) where else you've added this link, you might want to update it before it goes completely dead. With best regards as usual —— Shakescene (talk) 08:32, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

My mistake; I carelessly misread the Edit History under "External links"; you added a category template for Swedish Princes after some anonymous IP had (much earlier) entered the Online Gotha link. ¶ I have no idea of your views, so this isn't canvassing, but you might be interested in the proposal to drop "of the UK" from Edward VII-VIII and George V-VI at Talk:George VI of the United Kingdom#Requested move. —— Shakescene (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Oops !

Dear QELS,

Methinks you made a slight "booboo" here [1]

Cordialement ! --Frania W. (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

How do I delete a page? I need to delete the redirect Blessed Margaret of Lorraine first.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 22:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I do not understand: I tried doing a simple move by clicking on "move" then correct the title from "Blessef Margaret of Lorraine" to "Blessed Margaret of Lorraine". A red warning came up saying this could not be done because there is already a "Blessed Margaret of Lorraine" which, when clicked upon, brought me to "Blessef Margaret of Lorraine".

We may need the help of a wiki-expert on this one. Please do not copy & paste in order to get it right as we would lose the history of the article. We'll find someone to help. I'll check with you in a few hours

Aurevoir, Little Spy.

--Frania W. (talk) 04:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

QEIILS,

Just asked this contributor for help [2].

Aurevoir !

--Frania W. (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks :)!--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Little Spy, this is the contributor you should thank User talk:DrKiernan.

He asked a pertinent: "Should the "Blessed" be dropped?"

Aurevoir,

--Frania W. (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

What are you doing?

Why did you move the articles on the princes of Capua and Salerno and some of Benevento? Their titles were perfectly fine and perfectly in line with the naming conventions. All you've done is increase their length and add a visually annoying comma. You should undo all of those moves and take it to WP:RM. —Srnec (talk) 02:11, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I move them back but not because of your reasonings. Most counts, princes, and dukes are titled as such. I move them back because most of the Lombardic-Italian princelings are also titled as such and the Princes of Capua don't really have any articles about their children who were not Princes.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 02:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I don't think you understand the period. This is the early Middle Ages we're talking about. These are not "princelings" in a late medieval/Renaissance sense. These guys were more like kings (that is why they used the title prince instead of duke or count) than noblemen. Srnec (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Charles Augustus

Hi, the other page already seemed to have been deleted, so I've moved Charles Augustus, Hereditary Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (1912–1988) to the proper title. Adam Bishop (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Holy Roman Emperor

You recently approvingly restored the version of the article List of German monarchs to which I had reverted after a series of bad edits by MacKay86. Could please look at the above-linked article and review my revert this time. User MacKay, to judge by his langauge, has a serious problem meeting disagreement. Srnec (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. I totally stand on your side because that revert was my older contribution to the page. I don't why User MacKay like to create new pictures that are squashed versions of the original picture from the commons and also spacing each monarch in different tables. Do you know how we should tackle this? I mean we can't just keep reverting each others edits. Should we discuss this on the talk page or what? --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I didn't even notice the images until you pointed it out. It looks atrocious. I wouldn't be afraid about reverting him, since he is clearly out to lunch. That said, we could request a comment at the talk pages. Srnec (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Holy Roman Emperor

Hello, The Emperor's New Spy. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:Tsarevich of Russia

At the bottom of the Tsarevich of Russia template, you placed an "*" next to the names of Alexei Petrovich, Alexander Petrovich, Paul Petrovich, Peter Petrovich, Paul Petrovich, and Peter Petrovich with the note "raised to Grand Ducal rank in 1721." According to the Peter the Great article, except for the last Paul Petrovich, who was born and died in 1723, all of these people died before 1721. It seems to me that if 1721 is significant for right to the title "Grand Duke" then no one was "raised to Grand Ducal rank in 1721" as the last Paul Petrovich was born with that rank in 1723 and the others never had it. Am I missing something? Johnwilliammiller (talk) 06:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I think you're right. You can change it if you want.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I made the change.--Johnwilliammiller (talk) 04:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Galliera articles

Excellent job of writing, editing and layout! Thank you for showing that it is possible to juxtapose userboxes, genealogies, templates and lots of photos with concise, competent writing, minimal redundancy, and an eye to distinguishing the significant from the trivial. You hearten me! FactStraight (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. You should check List of Breton monarchs.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Mace

Dear Little Spy of Elizabeth ll, I noticed there is not an Article page for "The Mace", which gives Parliament it's power to rule. You might be the correct person to make it. MacOfJesus (talk) 17:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to burst your bubble, but no. I don't know much about it. The only articles I have create are mostly lists of rulers and consorts.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 04:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, only a thought, bubble intact, and Thanks, MacOfJesus (talk) 10:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Duchess of Nemours

Hey, you seem to have much more patience than I do; I started User:LouisPhilippeCharles/Duchess of Nemours ages ago but keep forgetting to do it! In case you were thinking of doing one, you are more than welcome use that as you wish! Work your magic ;) haha Prince LouisPhilippeCharles (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I'll get to it later.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)