User talk:TheSandDoctor/Archives/2017/September
This is an archive of past discussions about User:TheSandDoctor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nomination of MrBossFTW for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MrBossFTW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MrBossFTW until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 23:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Klemen Hribar) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Klemen Hribar, TheSandDoctor!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for 1 issue.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Matej Kök) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Matej Kök, TheSandDoctor!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for 1 issue.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Sašo Štalekar) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sašo Štalekar, TheSandDoctor!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has beent agged for 1 issue.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Bohemia Interactive
On 2 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bohemia Interactive, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Bohemia Interactive bought a T-72 tank, stating: "A massive tanks goes out to everyone who has supported the studio and its games throughout the past 16 years"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bohemia Interactive. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Rolling Stones: Havana Moon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Rolling Stones: Havana Moon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 22:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
23:56:56, 6 September 2017 review of submission by Sydneyanja
- Sydneyanja (talk · contribs)
- @Sydneyanja: You left a blank message on my talk page, was this created by accident? If not, I cannot assist you any without a message with a question. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: Yes, that was by accident. I actually typed a question but it disappeared. Here it is: How many independent sources would you like to see for Metal United Down Under? We do have quite a range of announcements and articles from the international and Australian metal media but I didn't want to flood the entry. Sydneyanja (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- So you are involved with the group Sydneyanja? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Is that a problem, TheSandDoctor? The project is running for some time and well-known in the Australian underground metal scene. It is a community project without financial gain for the initiators. Sydneyanja (talk) 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: That would be a conflict of interest, so please add the relevant template to the talk page of the draft (paid template for paid, or the non-paid editing one). As for references, there is no set number, but they must be notable and reliable. Typically, you are looking for major news coverage. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Is that a problem, TheSandDoctor? The project is running for some time and well-known in the Australian underground metal scene. It is a community project without financial gain for the initiators. Sydneyanja (talk) 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- So you are involved with the group Sydneyanja? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
While there is no doubt that "keep" is the outcome of this debate (with just two people arguing for deletion), it does not meet the criteria for a speedy keep. —Kusma (t·c) 17:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kusma: I was just referred to the guidelines earlier via email but have not had a chance to go through and correct them. That particular discussion closing rationale has been adjusted. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kusma: I have now gone through and I believe that I have fixed them all, let me know if I missed any, sorry about this. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- No worries, happy editing :) —Kusma (t·c) 19:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kusma: I have now gone through and I believe that I have fixed them all, let me know if I missed any, sorry about this. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Review My Page?
Hello. I was wondering you you could review my current article that is up for review? I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks so much! Langley242 (talk) 20:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mick Jagger at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed! :) Adityavagarwal (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Adityavagarwal: Thanks! I knew that it wasn't transcoded, just hadn't gotten around to finishing it (still haven't), trying to think of new hooks. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Would you mind undoing your relist here? We edit conflicted as I was casting my !vote, which would likely have made the consensus clear for an admin. Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: Certainly! I have undid the relist. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
1945 Rose Bowl score is incorrect.
Tennessee won the game 25 - 0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.200.235 (talk) 17:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @71.83.200.235: I have done a quick Google search and cannot find a reference supporting your claim of Tennessee winning 25-0 (and several disputing it), if you can find one, please do let me know. For future reference, if you have a reliable source to back up something like that and you see a factual error, you can be bold and fix it yourself as Wikipedia is a collaborative project that anyone can edit so long as they are not blocked/banned from the site. With that said, please do not do so unless you have a source to back it up. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, you're actually the second person to close this AfD as speedy deleted, but it still exists at Surya Hospital; Surya Hospitals (plural) was the one deleted G11, and the current article was created that same day. I've reverted and fixed the AfD header so it shouldn't happen anymore. ansh666 07:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that Ansh666, was just going off of the header and saw the red link so closed it. Thanks for fixing that in order to prevent it happening in the future. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nah, nothing to be sorry about. I should have fixed it after the first time anyways. ansh666 17:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
I disagree with the decision to relist again. The consensus seems fairly clear. Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. Discussion closed. Primefac (talk) 01:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Me-123567-Me:@Primefac: Sorry for the delay in response. I had relisted it to further confirm/solidify the consensus but agree that I could (and should) have closed it as the consensus was fairly clear. For that you have my apologies. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens. Primefac (talk) 01:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Me-123567-Me:@Primefac: Sorry for the delay in response. I had relisted it to further confirm/solidify the consensus but agree that I could (and should) have closed it as the consensus was fairly clear. For that you have my apologies. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
SMILE!! 16 Sept 2017
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Early Close of AfD for Originate
Hi, you closed AfD for Originate early - it must remain open for the full 168 hours. Also, Consensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments and I see no indications that of any reasoning or logic for your decision to Keep. It should have been relisted. At best it should have been closed as a "No Consensus". I've checked the references and none meet the criteria for establishing notability and I intended to !vote "Delete". Can you please reopen this AfD since it was not allowed to run the full 168 hours and given the lack of debate, should not have been closed and was more appropriate to relist. Thank you. -- HighKing++ 13:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @HighKing: Done. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you. -- HighKing++ 18:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:3D Ultra Radio Control Racers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:3D Ultra Radio Control Racers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Peter Bell (Reichstag)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. TheSandDoctor, thanks for creating Peter Bell (Reichstag)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs WP:INLINECITED sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Ali-A
On 21 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ali-A, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the creator of the popular YouTube channel Ali-A has been called a "YouTube megastar" by the BBC? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ali-A. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ali-A), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Mick Jagger
On 29 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mick Jagger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mick Jagger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mick Jagger), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisting...
Hi, TSD, Greetings:) Please review WP:NOQUORUM before relisting further AfDs.Anyways, thanks for your helping out help at the AfD workflow.Regards:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Godric on Leave: Hello Godric, have reviewed it. You're welcome! I help out where I can whenever possible across the project. :) --TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)