User talk:TheReverseTriangle

Welcome!

Hello, TheReverseTriangle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lil Fangs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tatupiplu'^talk 09:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Fangs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Fangs, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'^talk 09:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheReverseTriangle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That I am not here to build an encyclopedia, is the reason why my account has been blocked. I disagree with this insulting measure, because I am here to build an encyclopedia with the very best intentions. An encyclopedia shows factual displays, but if there is not one way a concept or person can be addressed, because there are several various points of view, they have to be addressed seperately. The worthiness of my content should be debated first, instead of deleted by these forms of abuse of authority. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I interpret your statement below as a withdrawal of this request. It is not possible for both technical and legal reasons to delete an account; if you no longer wish to edit, just abandon your account. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to Lil Fangs? 331dot (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am Lil Fangs. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should become familiar with the autobiography policy and why it is not advisable to attempt to write about yourself here. If you are just here to tell the world about yourself(something more suited to social media like Facebook than Wikipedia) then you aren't here to build an encyclopedia. Are there any edits you wish to make other than about yourself? 331dot (talk) 15:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not advisable to make an article about oneself, but it is not forbidden to make an article about oneself either, if I am correct.

I am not here to tell the world about myself personally. This is about aspects of the socioeconomic system that haven't addressed before. The creation of this page - and I was intending to create articles for the red links on the page I have created as well - is not to gain attention. If I wanted that then I would at least have been active on social media. D.O.C.I.S. International, Fangism, the Inner Crown, Elia PR and mass deletion are, I guess, indirectly about myself, too. I was hoping to see more of why people disagree with the content itself instead of why I should not be the one writing it. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) It is true that it is not absolutely forbidden to write about oneself. However, the odds of success are low, in part because people naturally write favorably about themselves, and Wikipedia strives to have a neutral point of view. I've been here many years, and I have never seen anyone succeed in writing an article about themselves(though it is technically possible). Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, not what potential article subjects want to say about themselves. That usually trips up many who attempt to write about themselves; in order for you to succeed in writing about yourself, you need to in essence forget everything you know about yourself and only write based on the content of independent sources. The draft you wrote was nowhere close to that, only sourced to things you are affiliated with. 331dot (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have deleted the Lil Fangs page. Never mind, then. Go ahead an delete my entire account as well. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote was absolutely not favorable about myself. How can you say that being considered a schizophrenic is something positive? TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll find a way to delete it myself, then. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dammit why can't accounts be deleted here :( TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, both technical and legal reasons do not allow for accounts to be deleted. The legal reason is that all edits must be attributable to someone. I did not say that you wrote favorably about yourself, only that doing so is a common reason why we don't encourage autobiographical edits. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck this place. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Literally no where it says "no one may ever write a page about oneself". I have shared more bad about myself than good. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it is completely true that autobiographical edits are not absolutely 100% forbidden. However, they do not usually succeed. 331dot (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They do not succeed because you and your fellow deletionists can easily abuse your authority and just delete pages without going in to the actual content of the article, I see. TheReverseTriangle (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went into the content of the article, but you have made up your mind that we are all mad with power and interested in silencing those who disagree with us. That's not me at all, you don't know me or my motives here. I'm here to help this project in any way I can, consistent with Wikipedia guidelines. You are free to work(if unblocked) to change those guidelines if you disagree with them. I don't have anything else to say, you are free to either request unblock again(which someone else will review) or abandon this account. 331dot (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Enough, TRT. You've been fortunate to find an administrator with tremendous patience for your nonsense, and you've repaid that patience by repetitive comments and attacks. I've revoked your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]