User talk:TheRatedRKOLegendKiller

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Phil Collins at United.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phil Collins at United.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priceless

The article should remain a redirect until the team becomes notable. Right now the members of the team tell enough information about the team that one is not needed. Plus Priceless (WWE Tag Team) is the wrong article to create.--WillC 02:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are referred to as Priceless, yes, but the correct article is Priceless (professional wrestling).--WillC 02:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, they are not notable. They get no article right now. The article should remain a redirect. A consensus was made at WT:PW to keep the article a redirect. Go there and discuss it to see if they are notable yet.--WillC 02:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please undo your edit. You must discuss it first. You can't just decide to make the article. You are going against consensus and can be blocked form editting as a result.--WillC 02:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cody Rhodes, you will be blocked from editing. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Millie Clode

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Millie Clode, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tvnewsroom.co.uk/biography/millie-clode. As a copyright violation, Millie Clode appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Millie Clode has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Millie Clode and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Millie Clode with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Millie Clode.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Riphamilton (talk) 07:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Ross. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Diamond in the Rough has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MuZemike 18:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joe McElderry, you will be blocked from editing. werldwayd (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at You Are Not Alone, you will be blocked from editing. werldwayd (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A little tip

Please don't vandalise any pages on this website. CheersCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seftinho (talk • contribs) 18:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello TheRatedRKOLegendKiller! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 271 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Matt Broughton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

It doesn't matter now because the SmackDown has aired, but do not vandalize PPV pages like you did to WWE Elimination Chamber again by adding unsourced info. TJ Spyke 14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Broughton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Broughton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Broughton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 09:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]