User talk:ThePhantom65

ThePhantom65, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ThePhantom65! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rita Sanders Geier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rita Sanders Geier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/94/644/602579/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mcampany (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I made these edits, mostly minor, but please check.
Brown II, M. Christopher; Dancy, T. Elon seems to lack a page number
Several paras are unreferenced. Most don't look particularly problematic, but if you could add refs that would be good.
Earwig scored 34%, which isn't dreadful, but it's almost entirely due to the close paraphrasing of Geier was born in Memphis, Tennessee, in 1944 to Edwin and Jessie Sanders. Her father was a Methodist minister, and her mother taught public school. In the course of Sanders's ministry, the family moved to several cities in Arkansas and Tennessee. In 1961, Geier graduated from the segregated Melrose High School in Memphis. to the source's Geier was born in Memphis in 1944, the second of Edwin and Jessie Sanders’s three children. Her father was a Methodist minister, and her mother taught public school. In the course of Sanders’s ministry, the family moved to several cities in Arkansas and Tennessee. In 1961, Geier graduated from the segregated Melrose High School in Memphis., so it would be good to tweak that para a bit

Otherwise looks OK, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC) Hi. Thanks again for all your help. I moved the page but am still seeing redirect on my Sandbox page. Can you help me remove that? ThePhantom65 (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi ThePhantom65! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Revise, rather than re-create a speedy deleted page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee L. Clayman (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide inline cites for the last line "In addition to her academic work, Clayman was the founding editor-in-chief of Oxford Bibliographies: Classics.She previously served as president of the Société internationale de bibliographie classique, and is past-president of the American Philological Association, now known as the Society for Classical Studies." As that are the things that fully convince me she is notable, but it needs to be verified. You can ping me or message me on my talk page when this is done and I'll review it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dee L. Clayman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dee L. Clayman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Hi. Thanks for the feedback. I made inline citations to the sections you noted. Please let me know if you have other concerns that should be addressed. Thanks again. ThePhantom65 (talk) 02:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee L. Clayman has been accepted

Dee L. Clayman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:GhostDust per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhostDust. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePhantom65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I see that you have blocked my account for sockpuppetry. I do know ColdDeepLake because we had to research and edit for a school project. But we are two separate people. I would appreciate it if you unblocked my account. Thank you. ThePhantom65 (talk) 18:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe is called meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll add, for the benefit of the next reviewer (should another unblock request be forthcoming), that this user has not addressed the connection to the other accounts in the SPI case. They have all been editing from the same device. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePhantom65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear User:Girth Summit and User:331dot and others: I have closely reviewed the wp:GAB and would like to make a second Unblock appeal. As I noted earlier, I do know ColdDeepLake from a school project. I was aware that they were going to make edits to the Maureen Orth article and now realize that under the definition of Meatpuppetry I should have disclosed this on my talk page. This was indeed an error on my part but one made out of ignorance, not an act of malice or deceit. I, personally, was not abusing multiple accounts but was aware that another person was editing the same article I was.

As far as the other users that were part of your investigation, I do not know them and have not collaborated with them on anything. I live in a multi-family apartment building and the landlord provides the internet access and workstations as part of our rent. Many different people here have been using these computers over the past two years. Please consider WP:DBQ in this instance.

I am mindful of your need to patrol the community and launch these kinds of investigations to maintain order in a very challenging online environment. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize.

It is a privilege to participate in this project and respectfully hope that you will reconsider this second appeal.

ThePhantom65 (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stale unblock request. You can make a new one if you want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.