User talk:TheKnightoftheHeart

Welcome!

Hello, TheKnightoftheHeart! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 09:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

TheKnightoftheHeart, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheKnightoftheHeart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad

Hello - would you please follow our guidelines at MOS:ISLAM. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Junaid Jamshed, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Junaid Jamshed

Dear TheKnightoftheHeart, assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabatakatuh. I hope you are well. Citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources are essential. Wikipedia requires them. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE and HERE.

This blasphemy affair is still in progress; it's unfolding as we speak. So please refrain from reaching conclusions not found in the sources or based on your own point of view. I don't actually have an interest in this guy Jamshed. He's not my ideal type of preacher. But that doesn't matter any more than your own view does. As editors we need to be objective. We also need to write in careful, proper English. I'm willing to try to help you do this if you'll let me. Pleased discuss the changes you want to make on the article's talk page. My regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Junaid Jamshed: Allegation of Blasphemy

I repeat what I said above: it cannot be stated or implied at this stage that Jamshed HAS committed blasphemy. It is currently just an ALLEGATION. Thus, the section can't be titled "Blasphemy". Please don't start an edit war on this issue. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TheKnightoftheHeart reported by User:Lukeno94 (Result: ). Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Junaid Jamshed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wifione ^Message 18:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As to what specific rule I violated, can you please make mention of that?TheKnightoftheHeart (talk) 04:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly reinstating contentious and challenged material into a BLP against consensus. Wifione ^Message 10:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheKnightoftheHeart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because two editors are friends with each other and the issue is concerning the blasphemy--hence the visible bias of the Wikipedia administrators, I have been blocked, the way they were editing regardlessly was not noted by the Wikipedia administrator, one-sided action had been taken against me; I quoted the official source of video in which the living person made an admission of committing blasphemy, yet it is not being allowed to be included, at the same time, the apology part from the same source is being mentioned, this is highly partial, the issue relates to the confession of blasphemy, not the conviction of blasphemy which is yet to happen. I did urge upon the confession part only. Without specifying any "particular" reason whatsoever, the partial Wikipedia administrator did block me. The bias is clearly visible, keep your Wikipedia as partial as possible. I am not interested in editing in your partial, biased Wikipedia anymore.

Decline reason:

Does not seem to understand BLP. If you are "no longer interested in editing" on Wikipedia, there's no point in unblocking this and no point in you making an unblock request in the first place. only (talk) 11:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear TheKnightoftheHeart, salam. I wish to make a correction: I do not know Lukeno94. He is not my "friend" and I have no contact with him outside of Wikipedia. He is anonymous to me. I merely see him as an excellent, professional and ethical editor with a fine record on Wikipedia. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gorge is correct. Also, as a rule of thumb, if you're blocked for making BLP-violating statements, it is a really bad idea to keep making the same statements in your unblock request; you should also read WP:NOTTHEM. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]